d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Flat Earth > Real Stars
Prev1262728293089Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 27 2016 11:54am
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 27 2016 02:10am)
i swear the amount of times he's used "100%" in these types of posts is pitiful. Its nothing but self affirmation that HE'S the one doing research and that everyone else is just swallowing what's already on their plate. It's the only way that he can rectify proof that challenges his bias. IF he were to accept that this evidence you're presenting was actually studied and considered for validity by you he loses the one tool he has to continue one, that all science has just been blindly followed for centuries and never challenged. In his mind things like gravity and other physical constants are just assumed values with no evidence to support their values. His intellectual edge is to always think he is the more studied one, that he has seen the whole gambit of material and made the informed decision that everyone else is too "lazy" to make.

He is now on the block list, but i still get a real kick out of reading some of his garbage since yesterday in the quotes.


Let me explain "100%" and why it is proof that some are stuck like a broken record on black and white thinking while thinking they are not.

Is every aspect of science 100% correct and true and we are at the ultimate peak of all understanding? - I'm guessing that you would say no.

So can you name one thing in science that is wrong? If you cant, you are socially indoctrinated and ruled by fear. If you dare to say something, I could use monkey butt rage, and slam you with something science said and then call you a nasty insult and accuse you of not going to school and possibly being a retard. So really at this point, everyone is afraid to question any aspect of science. Science is trying use incestuous logic at times and then relying on social norms to scare people into accepting it 100%. Sorta like how they get you to buy into two of the craziest theories ever - The big bang theory and the theory of evolution.
1) - If gravity is mass attracting mass, how can particles traveling away from each other at the speed of light be attracted to one another, take any two objects (that aren't even traveling away from each other) and tell me there is any attraction to each other and I would say you're simply a fool.
2) - Why cant we create life from no life - because that's how the theory of evolution starts - the birth of anti-logic i guess.
3) - How is any life created without a woman? <------insert sound of crickets here
4) - how can anyone believe that the universe is just random space dust - when everything we know about it is not random.
5) - Things never go from disorder to order by random, unless there is intelligent control

Am i saying all of science is wrong? Of course not, but people need to question their reality and if some people are hell bent on stopping all scrutiny - it shows that some feel that this world is ruled by dogmatic blind faith and that science has all the answers and is unquestionable. People need to stop the B&W thinking, aren't even remotely aware they are suffering from it , think they can judge people they dont even know and feel justified in their monkey butt rage. Science is not perfect - get over it.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 27 2016 11:58am
Member
Posts: 92,926
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 27 2016 12:04pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Oct 27 2016 11:54am)
Let me explain "100%" and why it is proof that some are stuck like a broken record on black and white thinking while thinking they are not.

Is every aspect of science 100% correct and true and we are at the ultimate peak of all understanding? - I'm guessing that you would say no.

So can you name one thing in science that is wrong? If you cant, you are socially indoctrinated and ruled by fear. If you dare to say something, I could use monkey butt rage, and slam you with something science said and then call you a nasty insult and accuse you of not going to school and possibly being a retard. So really at this point, everyone is afraid to question any aspect of science. Science is trying use incestuous logic at times and then relying on social norms to scare people into accepting it 100%. Sorta like how they get you to buy into two of the craziest theories ever - The big bang theory and the theory of evolution.
1) - If gravity is mass attracting mass, how can particles traveling away from each other at the speed of light be attracted to one another, take any two objects (that aren't even traveling away from each other) and tell me there is any attraction to each other and I would say you're simply a fool.
2) - Why cant we create life from no life - because that's how the theory of evolution starts - the birth of anti-logic i guess.
3) - How is any life created without a woman? <------insert sound of crickets here
4) - how can anyone believe that the universe is just random space dust - when everything we know about it is not random.
5) - Things never go from disorder to order by random, unless there is intelligent control

Am i saying all of science is wrong? Of course not, but people need to question their reality and if some people are hell bent on stopping all scrutiny - it shows that some feel that this world is ruled by dogmatic blind faith and that science has all the answers and is unquestionable. People need to stop the B&W thinking, aren't even remotely aware they are suffering from it , think they can judge people they dont even know and feel justified in their monkey butt rage. Science is not perfect - get over it.


you're just confirming you don't understand how normal people approach science at all. Normal people see modern science as nothing more than the current place on the spectrum between ignorance and knowing everything. People accept fully that theories will change and new discoveries will continue forever. They simply default to what modern scientists are saying about modern discoveries because they aren't doctorate candidates with the knowledge to refute it, and generally modern science provides a fairly credible view because it's the result of many theories and tests coming together into a consensus. The fact that you constantly deny these people who have worked their entire lives in favor of youtube scientists and fringe agents in the field speaks to your true motivation, to find a truth you feel a hiveminded bourgeoisie is hiding from you. You don't argue against modern science from a logical observational standpoint you do it from an anxious and paranoid conspiratorial standpoint. Or simply because your brain needs to simplify concepts like "well if we are moving how come i can't feel it", hmmm perhaps because you've never NOT been moving.

whew, that was a lot to do on my phone. last time i swear.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Oct 27 2016 12:05pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 27 2016 12:18pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 27 2016 08:04am)
you're just confirming you don't understand how normal people approach science at all. Normal people see modern science as nothing more than the current place on the spectrum between ignorance and knowing everything. People accept fully that theories will change and new discoveries will continue forever. They simply default to what modern scientists are saying about modern discoveries because they aren't doctorate candidates with the knowledge to refute it, and generally modern science provides a fairly credible view because it's the result of many theories and tests coming together into a consensus. The fact that you constantly deny these people who have worked their entire lives in favor of youtube scientists and fringe agents in the field speaks to your true motivation, to find a truth you feel a hiveminded bourgeoisie is hiding from you. You don't argue against modern science from a logical observational standpoint you do it from an anxious and paranoid conspiratorial standpoint. Or simply because your brain needs to simplify concepts like "well if we are moving how come i can't feel it", hmmm perhaps because you've never NOT been moving.

whew, that was a lot to do on my phone. last time i swear.


So thanks for proving everything i claimed, that you believe in all science 100% and are completely 100% indoctrinated by a profound fear in denying any of it simply because agreed upon opinion is undeniable if you are told they are "smarter" than you. 4 out of 5 Doctors agree with me. :P

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 27 2016 12:21pm
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Oct 27 2016 12:36pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Oct 27 2016 12:18pm)
So thanks for proving everything i claimed, that you believe in all science 100% and are completely 100% indoctrinated by a profound fear in denying any of it simply because agreed upon opinion is undeniable if you are told they are "smarter" than you.



Thats actually closer to the opposite of what he said.
0/10 troll
10/10 buthurt

Member
Posts: 92,926
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 27 2016 12:37pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Oct 27 2016 12:18pm)
So thanks for proving everything i claimed, that you believe in all science 100% and are completely 100% indoctrinated by a profound fear in denying any of it simply because agreed upon opinion is undeniable if you are told they are "smarter" than you. 4 out of 5 Doctors agree with me. :P


the fact that you think the phrase "default to" means "100% believe in" shows you're pretty incapable of understanding what i mean. I guess you can confirm any bias you need to, even others' confirmation bias.

you're not qualified to correct any scientists on any subject, because you're a highschool educated burnout with a degree from youtube. If I have to choose between "believing" a scientist or you I'm going to default to the scientist, because well... i don't have the time nor desire to disprove that scientist or go through the years it would take to credibly do so. Because unlike you the shape of the earth isn't even something that concerns me, mainly because i don't have a bias in my brain that a worldwide shadow organization is running the show and controlling the brains of the human population.
Member
Posts: 40,316
Joined: Dec 16 2008
Gold: 92.71
Warn: 50%
Oct 27 2016 12:38pm
100%
100%
Monkey butt raged
Member
Posts: 7,324
Joined: Dec 22 2002
Gold: 1,261.00
Oct 27 2016 02:26pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Oct 27 2016 10:54am)
Let me explain "100%" and why it is proof that some are stuck like a broken record on black and white thinking while thinking they are not.

Is every aspect of science 100% correct and true and we are at the ultimate peak of all understanding? - I'm guessing that you would say no.

So can you name one thing in science that is wrong? If you cant, you are socially indoctrinated and ruled by fear. If you dare to say something, I could use monkey butt rage, and slam you with something science said and then call you a nasty insult and accuse you of not going to school and possibly being a retard. So really at this point, everyone is afraid to question any aspect of science. Science is trying use incestuous logic at times and then relying on social norms to scare people into accepting it 100%. Sorta like how they get you to buy into two of the craziest theories ever - The big bang theory and the theory of evolution.
1) - If gravity is mass attracting mass, how can particles traveling away from each other at the speed of light be attracted to one another, take any two objects (that aren't even traveling away from each other) and tell me there is any attraction to each other and I would say you're simply a fool.
2) - Why cant we create life from no life - because that's how the theory of evolution starts - the birth of anti-logic i guess.
3) - How is any life created without a woman? <------insert sound of crickets here
4) - how can anyone believe that the universe is just random space dust - when everything we know about it is not random.
5) - Things never go from disorder to order by random, unless there is intelligent control

Am i saying all of science is wrong? Of course not, but people need to question their reality and if some people are hell bent on stopping all scrutiny - it shows that some feel that this world is ruled by dogmatic blind faith and that science has all the answers and is unquestionable. People need to stop the B&W thinking, aren't even remotely aware they are suffering from it , think they can judge people they dont even know and feel justified in their monkey butt rage. Science is not perfect - get over it.


You don't understand science. I can name lots of things that science in the past thought correct and were later shown to be wrong. If we knew that some scientific understanding right now was wrong, it wouldn't be the scientific understanding anymore. As soon as you can conclusively show something to be wrong, the scientific community will accept it as such and adopt a different idea.

1) Take two magnets and let them click together. Now start pulling them apart. Congratulations, you now have two objects that are travelling away from each other but are clearly attracted to each other.
2) The theory of evolution does not deal with how life came to be. It only deals with how living organisms change.
3) Bacteria have no concept of gender or females, yet have no problem reproducing, as is evidenced by people getting sick all the time.
4) Pretty sure nobody in the world believes that the universe is "just random space dust". At the very least our planet is part of the universe, and it is not space dust.
5) So if I take 5 dice and keep randomly throwing them, there is no chance I'll randomly get "1, 2, 3, 4, 5"?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Oct 27 2016 03:02pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 27 2016 08:37am)
Because unlike you the shape of the earth


That shows clearly that you have bias because i dont care what the shape of the world is - the only reason you think its a ball 100% is because of "gravity" and no experiment ever has never been shown to exist that proves it without a doubt and even your greatest ass-tro preist can't explain what it is except make some cosmic poetry analogy and dance around the fact its just a myth of blind faith and If I dare point that out, your monkey butt rage becomes engorged with your need to begin the shit flinging if i have the nerve to even suggest another possible explanation for the nature of the universe.

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 27 2016 08:37am)
you're not qualified to correct any scientists on any subject, because you're a highschool educated burnout with a degree from youtube.


you're not qualified to state opinions, clearly only state sanctioned scientists are qualified to state opinions and only if they are agreed upon with other state sanctioned scientists, because your an immature LLD butt raged monkey with a degree from pop science website where actual scientists are reported to figure out the nature of the universe by "presumably" smashing more particles together - I suppose confirming that when boys smash toy trucks together they are not playing - they are doing Science!

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 27 2016 08:37am)
i don't have the time nor desire to disprove that scientist or go through the years it would take to credibly do so.
Why would you think you have to do that?
I dont like NDT, I dont like Donald Trump. I didn't like the last Pope. I didn't like GWB as potus, So what? That you think it would take years of discrediting is but a window in how indoctrinated you are.
I didn't like it when Hillary Clinton called Trump supporters a basket of deplorables, but she apologized and knows the job of Potus is to bring people together not rip them apart. If she does anything i dont like ill say it - really this a huge window into how you feel justified into judging people.

Quote (thesnipa @ Oct 27 2016 08:37am)
i don't have a bias in my brain that a worldwide shadow organization is running the show and controlling the brains of the human population.


I assume your talking about the "illuminati" - they're certainly more real than bigfoot - do the elite form clubs in their circle jerk - certainly.
Are some people bigger asses than others - for sure.

Do the elite have a nick name to call poor people - "Leachers, pond sukers, trailer park trash, crack whores, rednecks, gutter punks, ass strapped

Should poor people have a nick name for the elite - sure!

Is there an actual organization called the "Illuminati" - of course not

Does it matter - no.

Do you ever have a point or understand anything - no.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Oct 27 2016 03:14pm
Member
Posts: 92,926
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Oct 27 2016 03:13pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Oct 27 2016 03:02pm)
That shows clearly that you have bias because i dont care what the shape of the world is - the only reason you think its a ball 100% is because of "gravity" and no experiment ever has never been shown to exist that proves it without a doubt and even your greatest ass-tro preist can't explain what it is except make some cosmic poetry analogy and dance around the fact its just a myth of blind faith and If I dare point that out, your monkey butt rage becomes engorged with your need to begin the shit flinging if i have the nerve to even suggest another possible explanation for the nature of the universe.



you're not qualified to state opinions because your an immature LLD butt raged monkey with a degree from pop science website where actual scientists are reported to figure out the nature of the universe by "presumably" smashing more particles together - I suppose confirming that when boys smash toy trucks together they are not playing - they are doing Science!

Why would you think you have to do that?
I dont like NDT, I dont like Donald Trump. I didn't like the last Pope. I didn't like GWB as potus, So what? That you think it would take years of discrediting is but a window in how indoctrinated you are.
I didn't like it when Hillary Clinton called Trump supporters a basket of deplorables, but she apologized and knows the job of Potus is to bring people together not rip them apart. If she does anything i dont like ill say it - really this a huge window into how you feel justified into judging people.



I assume your talking about the "illuminati" - they're certainly more real than bigfoot - do the elite form clubs in their circle jerk - certainly.
Are some people bigger asses than others - for sure.

Do the elite have a nick name to call poor people - "Leachers, pond sukers, trailer park trash, crack whores, rednecks, gutter punks, ass strapped

Should poor people have a nick name for the elite - sure!

Is there an actual organization called the "Illuminati" - of course not

Does it matter - no.

Do you ever have a point or understand anything - no.


Ignores Russians post to rant at me. Makes sense tbh just make sure to print a copy for your shrink.
Member
Posts: 40,316
Joined: Dec 16 2008
Gold: 92.71
Warn: 50%
Oct 27 2016 03:56pm
What percentage of people believe the earth is flat?

Also, how old are you, jw?
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1262728293089Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll