Your "necessary" attributes aren't justified they are simply presumptive. Also you conveniently ignored my counterpoint that jesus is a localized physical entity just like Thanos which disqualifies him from your own criteria.
Saying that knowledge itself is impossible without logic being grounded is an argument from ignorance.
You stated god is or has invariant mind. This is clearly not the case since he changes his mind and actions constantly in the bible from deciding to kill or spare people. The very act of learning new information creates a change.
the necessary attributes are a priori from the category of transcendentals, this isn't "presumptive" if by that you mean "baseless".
Jesus is fully God and fully human, I don't see the issue or any strength in your "counterpoint".
it is not an argument from ignorance, you have no idea what you're talking about. this is an argument from necessity.
if you cannot justify reason there is no justified reason to believe you have knowledge using your worldview. do you understand this? you can still have knowledge but it means your worldview is not the correct one as it does not justify knowledge. if we work purely within the grounds of your own worldview and say there is no possibility of intelligibility knowledge becomes impossible.
God does not change his mind nor does he learn anything, holy tradition is meant to reveal God to us, not to take in whatever weird personal hyper literal interpretation you are making right now. I don't have interest in debating your strawman of my worldview so if you have questions just ask, in the same way I ask:
What is your worldview and how does it account for the possibility of intelligibility? how does it ground universal, invariant and immaterial laws of logic?