d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Official Political Picture Thread
Prev1264626472648264926505001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Jan 23 2019 03:24pm
Quote (GLYC123 @ Jan 23 2019 02:21pm)
Side note, does anybody think there's going to be any lawsuits because of this Covington ordeal?


bunch of kids from money and lawyer parents

that shit was being looked into within 18 seconds of the first story

Member
Posts: 10,060
Joined: Mar 30 2010
Gold: 10,779.02
Jan 23 2019 03:32pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Jan 23 2019 04:24pm)
bunch of kids from money and lawyer parents

that shit was being looked into within 18 seconds of the first story


So much hate in the beowolf.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Jan 23 2019 03:33pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 23 2019 03:05pm)
this doesnt say anything about the causation though. do places with great problems with illegal guns pass stricter gun control laws, or does gun regulation cause people to evade those laws with illegal guns?


Doesn't matter, as far as this discussion goes. My whole point was that places with lower gun control laws also have problems with illegal guns, contrary to what EndlessSky posted.
Member
Posts: 50,929
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Jan 23 2019 04:31pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 23 2019 02:33pm)
Real-time location tracking for privately owned guns would be the NSA's wet dream. I dont think a lot of gun owners would be up for that. But say there is an "emergency gun" in a school principal's office, then it could make a lot of sense.

For privately owned guns, the most I can see having appeal to a large share of gun owners is a state- or region-tracking which alerts the gun owner (not the police!) if his gun is located outside of a certain radius around his home.


That's why it would be important for it to be a voluntary and non-coercive program. IE not only being opt-in only, but having legal statutes barring any kinds of deprivation of rights for those who don't opt-in. They wouldn't be able to say 'gun chip areas only'.
And its also a good reason for it to be customizable chips. Where you'd be able to choose which features to select. Only get a tracking chip if that's what you want. You could have an inert RFID chip or a full GPS black box real-time tracker like in wildlife.
It would also probably be important for the program to stress privacy being maintained, like encrypted data accessible only using the chip like a dongle- not a searchable database. On one hand, that wouldn't be any guarantee at all against the NSA snooping that data when its being entered into the system, which they almost certainly would. But at least it would give a degree of privacy to those who opt-in and prevent low scale abuse like we have in the vehicle license plate system where operators can abuse it.

I feel like as long as its feature rich, taxpayer subsidized and provides services gun-owners actually would want, like anti-theft, assisting law enforcement in a crisis, automatically alerting cops when fired in self defense, etc- there would be plenty of people who would sign up for it. The NRA always screams very loudly about responsible gun owners and good guys with guns. If the chips actually made responsible gun ownership safer and more effective, and the only reason to opt-out is nebulous fears of loss of privacy- then the militiamen and libertarian nutters could opt-out and the regular folks could opt-in.
Member
Posts: 54,196
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Jan 23 2019 05:28pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 23 Jan 2019 23:31)
That's why it would be important for it to be a voluntary and non-coercive program. IE not only being opt-in only, but having legal statutes barring any kinds of deprivation of rights for those who don't opt-in. They wouldn't be able to say 'gun chip areas only'.
And its also a good reason for it to be customizable chips. Where you'd be able to choose which features to select. Only get a tracking chip if that's what you want. You could have an inert RFID chip or a full GPS black box real-time tracker like in wildlife.
It would also probably be important for the program to stress privacy being maintained, like encrypted data accessible only using the chip like a dongle- not a searchable database. On one hand, that wouldn't be any guarantee at all against the NSA snooping that data when its being entered into the system, which they almost certainly would. But at least it would give a degree of privacy to those who opt-in and prevent low scale abuse like we have in the vehicle license plate system where operators can abuse it.

I feel like as long as its feature rich, taxpayer subsidized and provides services gun-owners actually would want, like anti-theft, assisting law enforcement in a crisis, automatically alerting cops when fired in self defense, etc- there would be plenty of people who would sign up for it. The NRA always screams very loudly about responsible gun owners and good guys with guns. If the chips actually made responsible gun ownership safer and more effective, and the only reason to opt-out is nebulous fears of loss of privacy- then the militiamen and libertarian nutters could opt-out and the regular folks could opt-in.


I just think that fears of a creeping loss of privacy in the long run are well justified and not "nebulous" at all.

Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 23 2019 05:41pm
Quote (djman72 @ Jan 23 2019 04:32pm)
So much hate in the beowolf.


Race wars and class wars are the only thing they have left. We should count ourselves lucky
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Jan 23 2019 05:52pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Jan 23 2019 04:41pm)
Race wars and class wars are the only thing they have left. We should count ourselves lucky


Does accurately stating that people with resources and surrounded by careers in the legal system are more likely than those that don't trigger the right now too?
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Jan 23 2019 06:16pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Jan 23 2019 06:52pm)
Does accurately stating that people with resources and surrounded by careers in the legal system are more likely than those that don't trigger the right now too?


Its something that Steve King would say.

Quote (Surfpunk @ Jan 23 2019 04:33pm)
Doesn't matter, as far as this discussion goes. My whole point was that places with lower gun control laws also have problems with illegal guns, contrary to what EndlessSky posted.


Lefties tend to ignore per capita statistics because you can't bribe voters if the concepts in your rhetoric are too complex.
Member
Posts: 53,552
Joined: Mar 6 2008
Gold: 1,908.33
Jan 23 2019 06:57pm


Member
Posts: 105,152
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Jan 23 2019 07:30pm
















Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1264626472648264926505001Next
Closed New Topic New Poll