Quote (Black XistenZ @ Jan 23 2019 02:33pm)
Real-time location tracking for privately owned guns would be the NSA's wet dream. I dont think a lot of gun owners would be up for that. But say there is an "emergency gun" in a school principal's office, then it could make a lot of sense.
For privately owned guns, the most I can see having appeal to a large share of gun owners is a state- or region-tracking which alerts the gun owner (not the police!) if his gun is located outside of a certain radius around his home.
That's why it would be important for it to be a voluntary and non-coercive program. IE not only being opt-in only, but having legal statutes barring any kinds of deprivation of rights for those who don't opt-in. They wouldn't be able to say 'gun chip areas only'.
And its also a good reason for it to be
customizable chips. Where you'd be able to choose which features to select. Only get a tracking chip if that's what you want. You could have an inert RFID chip
or a full GPS black box real-time tracker like in wildlife.
It would also probably be important for the program to stress privacy being maintained, like encrypted data accessible only using the chip like a dongle- not a searchable database. On one hand, that wouldn't be any guarantee at all against the NSA snooping that data when its being entered into the system, which they almost certainly would. But at least it would give a degree of privacy to those who opt-in and prevent low scale abuse like we have in the vehicle license plate system where operators can abuse it.
I feel like as long as its feature rich, taxpayer subsidized and provides services gun-owners actually would want, like anti-theft, assisting law enforcement in a crisis, automatically alerting cops when fired in self defense, etc- there would be plenty of people who would sign up for it. The NRA always screams very loudly about responsible gun owners and good guys with guns. If the chips actually made responsible gun ownership safer and more effective, and the only reason to opt-out is nebulous fears of loss of privacy- then the militiamen and libertarian nutters could opt-out and the regular folks could opt-in.