Quote (fender @ Oct 19 2023 05:14pm)
ITT: "if you don't have a detailed military and intelligence plan that describes exactly how the IDF could eliminate hamas without any civilian casualties, you're not allowed to say that the indiscriminate bombing of residential areas, the cutting of water and electricity to literally everyone, the mass dislocation of hundreds of thousands of destitute vulnerable people, are NOT 'targeted' measures to defeat hamas, but actions that predictably lead to an already staggering death toll amongst civilians."
it's the whole "you're not allowed to have an opinion if you don't lived there - unless you happen to agree with me" angle of trying to silence criticism of OBVIOUS cruelty against civilians.
how about this: if you actually consider yourself the "non-terrorist, civilised" side, then YOU explain how your actions are not just the apparent retaliatory terror attacks they seem to be, but actually specifically designed actions to mostly eliminate terrorist. which measures did you undertake to actually prevent civilian casualties and suffering? because it sure as hell does NOT look like it's working, and you created a pile of innocent bodies that easily dwarfs that of the "worst attack on jewish people since the holocaust"...
it's funny how the mossad was able to hunt down resourceful nazi war criminals decades after they disappeared to locations all over the world, how they were able to assassinate the alleged planners of the munich '72 terror attacks, how they can eliminate high ranking generals within hostile countries, without making much of a fuss - yet in order to eliminate some malnourished radicals right on their doorstep, in a small area of land whose borders israel controls directly, they simply can't do better than slaughtering thousands of innocent civilians in order to achieve their alleged goal?
how little common sense, how little intellectual honesty, and how little regard for innocent lives do you have to have in order to buy into that stupid narrative and try to silence criticism of such cruelty?
___________________________________________________________________
don't play dumb. i'm talking about him deliberately propping up hamas in order to prevent more moderate voices from leading gaza. his disgusting calculation of accepting the odd attack in order to maintain support for the illegal occupation and apartheid policies. if you're actually an israeli, you know exactly what i'm talking about.
oh, and nice dodge regarding all the israeli terrorists, guess you're just fine with them for some mysterious reason...
it's really funny how almost every single one of you turned out to be extremist radicals yourselves, one openly calling for the genocide of the lebanese, you wishing death to people who disagree with you online... literally just the other side of the coin of hamas terrorists...
Gaza strip elected Hamas by majority in 2006, their political opponent was Fatah
in 2007 Hamas beheaded most of them to prevent them from being elected ever again and took control of the strip.
Ive no idea what are you referring to, but no prime minister ever here promoted or supported hamas, we knew long time ago how cruel and heartless they are.
I do not dodge anything, I dont know any Israeli terror organization lol, we have IDF and as i said, most moral and humanic army in the world. facts.
you blaming us on killing babys and women?
Blame hamas for using them as human shield.
while also, just a week ago you've seen hamas taking babies as hostages, freaking 6 months old babies!
I do not wish death to people who disagree with me, you can try and draw things the way it is convinient for you... doesnt mean its true. I condemn terrorists.
there is no place here for provoking or nice wording for "I wish your country would be gone" in this forum, and if you were just to yourself, you would've challange the other guy and not me
