Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 30 2018 11:56am)

back to what year? pre 2016, 2016, or post 2016?

because after reading that i think you might be high on bath salts.

Quote

Quote (ofthevoid @ Nov 30 2018 01:51pm)

You highlight the bolded like it's some great feat of integrity. If 100 crooks go to a politician and give various gifts and then when that politician gets a higher post remembers who his "friends" were in the past and starts making decisions favorable to those friends, does it matter that she vouched she will no longer accept gifts?

Trump's business has been branding for decades. It was his business 20 years ago and it remains that today. His baseline didn't change, therefore a foreigner coming to him about his hotel businesses is not necessarily rent-seeking behavior.

The Clintons made their political career a business. Maybe it wasn't always like that, but it's been that way since her time as Secretary of State. You're a hypocrite because if you were consistent in your ideological stance you would be critical of all foreign intervention in our politics not just whichever flavor pundits tell you to be outraged about.

Quote (IceMage @ Nov 30 2018 01:28pm)

I'm not sure how I'm a hypocrite... I said it's concerning and I'm glad the FBI is looking into it.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Nov 30 2018 01:54pm)

He has been supportive of her for as long as I remember. Sounds to me like you have a revisionist perspective because some of us that have been here long enough know who supported who. I remember him consistently voicing support for her, her policies, etc.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Nov 30 2018 02:03pm)

Literally, the first page of this thread.

He is a neocon. She is a neocon. It's not a surprise when the Republican neocons were ousted he went to the other neocon. I'm not going to sit here and waste my time combing through posts to prove he has supported her, it's obvious.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Nov 30 2018 01:03pm)

Literally, the first page of this thread.

He is a neocon. She is a neocon. It's not a surprise when the Republican neocons were ousted he went to the other neocon. I'm not going to sit here and waste my time combing through posts to prove he has supported her, it's obvious.

Quote (IceMage @ Aug 25 2015 07:13pm)

I know right.

I watched the news conference, and I watched the CNN coverage later on, and the clips they picked out were very misleading. They compiled clips of the reporter talking over Trump, and cut out basically all of Trump's responses.

What can we expect from the liberal media?

Quote (IceMage @ 30 Nov 2018 15:14)

It's not a great feat... it's something that should be expected from any president. She was willing to do the right thing, Trump was not.

If you think Trump's business isn't a point of leverage over him, then you're just incredibly naive. The orange colored glasses just never come off.

I'm a little confused here... are you not able to read my full post?





The only reason I come across that way is because the vast majority of the criticism of Hillary on this forum is moronic. Like pretending she's going to start WW3 in Syria, or that her email scandal was some super serious national security issue.



That was just a post trying to trigger people. I prefer a pragmatic foreign policy... Obama did a pretty good job. Hillary was a little more hawkish than I'd prefer, but still far better than Trump.

Also, I'm the guy who criticizes Trump for increasing the military budget. Not exactly a neoconservative stance.

Quote (ofthevoid @ 30 Nov 2018 15:03)

Literally, the first page of this thread.

He is a neocon. She is a neocon. It's not a surprise when the Republican neocons were ousted he went to the other neocon. I'm not going to sit here and waste my time combing through posts to prove he has supported her, it's obvious.

Quote (thesnipa @ Nov 30 2018 02:18pm)

inorite?? and he things thousands of dead people "deserved it" too....

Quote (IceMage @ Jan 26 2016 07:22pm)

http://www.mediaite.com/online/fox-news-responds-to-trumps-latest-twitter-poll-with-first-rate-trolling/

Grade A trolling by the Donald. If this guy would moderate a bit I'd love to support him.

Quote (IceMage @ Nov 30 2018 12:14pm)

It's not a great feat... it's something that should be expected from any president. She was willing to do the right thing, Trump was not.

If you think Trump's business isn't a point of leverage over him, then you're just incredibly naive. The orange colored glasses just never come off.

I'm a little confused here... are you not able to read my full post?





The only reason I come across that way is because the vast majority of the criticism of Hillary on this forum is moronic. Like pretending she's going to start WW3 in Syria, or that her email scandal was some super serious national security issue.



That was just a post trying to trigger people. I prefer a pragmatic foreign policy... Obama did a pretty good job. Hillary was a little more hawkish than I'd prefer, but still far better than Trump.

Also, I'm the guy who criticizes Trump for increasing the military budget. Not exactly a neoconservative stance.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Nov 30 2018 02:35pm)

Ah, well you said in one or two posts that you support the investigation into her dealings by the FBI so obviously you're objective!

Objectivity bleeds through in proportional criticism, not five posts vs 30,000 posts about Orange man bad.

This is literally the first time I heard you said anything about his military spending. Sorry, I probably missed it since the overwhelming amount of your posts are about his tweets and Russia collusion confirmed.

Quote (IceMage @ Sep 10 2018 10:28am)

The military-industrial complex controls this administration... just look at the defense budget, NATO funding, drone strikes, Ukraine, Russia, Iran, Yemen, Afghanistan, Syria, etc. Trump bamboozled the anti-war crowd on the right... yet they still sing his praises. :rofl:

Quote (ofthevoid @ Sep 10 2018 11:57am)

Haha, Drumpf also increased the military budget, anti-war Trump supporters dumb! GOT EMMM1!!! Hey, Ricky Ritardo can you point to a single president in recent history that significantly reduced the defense budget?

It's about comparative analysis and choosing the lesser of two evils. It was either Trump or Hillary destructor of worlds Clinton. At least Trump isn't starting wars or sending tens of thousands of troops all over the globe. In fact, he wanted to take the remaining troops out of Afghanistan but was dissuaded. Hillary is one of the primary reasons Lybia is in shambles, she wanted to topple Assad, she wanted to send troops+arms to Ukraine, etc. So yes if you are part of the anti-war crowd Trump is a better choice 10/10 times.

Quote (ofthevoid @ Nov 30 2018 01:35pm)

Ah, well you said in one or two posts that you support the investigation into her dealings by the FBI so obviously you're objective!

Objectivity bleeds through in proportional criticism, not five posts vs 30,000 posts about Orange man bad.

This is literally the first time I heard you say anything about his military spending. Sorry, I probably missed it since the overwhelming amount of your posts are about his tweets and Russia collusion confirmed.

Quote (IceMage @ Nov 30 2018 01:45pm)

Hillary is somewhere walking in the woods... why would we bother with hashed out 2016 topics about her?

You forgot about this triggering?

Quote (IceMage @ Nov 30 2018 03:14pm)

Also, I'm the guy who criticizes Trump for increasing the military budget. Not exactly a neoconservative stance.