Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 25 2020 02:25pm)
A compromise that I actually like quite a lot would be to allocate two thirds of a state's electoral votes according to the vote shares in that state, and one third according to the overall winner. If there are fractions, round up the number allocated to the statewide winning party.
So for example, if Trump wins Florida by 50.1% vs Biden's 49.8%, Trump would get two thirds of Florida's votes in the EC and Biden one third.
Say that Biden has meanwhile won California with 69% vs Trump's 30%.
55/3 = 18.333, so Biden would get this many EC votes for winning CA. The remaining 36.666 EC votes of CA would get distributed according to the popular vote share: 0.69*36.666 = 25.3, 0.3*36.666 = 11.
Hence, Biden would get ceil(18.333 + 25.3) = ceil(43.63) = 44 EC votes, Trump only receives 11.
With this system, there are far less wasted votes in the states with a noteworthy population (RI Republican voters and WY Democrats are still out of luck...), and candidates are rewarded for decisive wins and punished for scraping by.
Why 2/3rds? That seems rather arbitrary. Why not just give 2 (the senators) EVs to the winner and then the rest you split up according to popular vote?