Wrong. The sentence work like distributing a number over things in a parenthesis...

2(a+b) = 2a + 2b <--- where the 2 is "shall not be infringed"


The comma after "a free state" stands for... and

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 21 2018 04:49pm

Wrong.
If you want to get it, really get it, I mean really get it, you’d see it.

Go back to school, learn English... as in the King's English, which is how they wrote in those days.

yes it does. historical context is extremely important. on the one hand you people act like the founding fathers were so smart that they totally accounted for the potential drawbacks of drowning in an ocean of guns, but definitely thought that daily mass shootings and 3rd world country homicide rates are worth it, to prevent a 'tyrannical government' from oppressing you - but on the other hand they were unable to see what's wrong with slavery? makes total sense... NOT.

*gasps*
*srikes cheek with a glove*
How dare you, sir!

If the speech is that old and something as simple as day-to-day wording has changed, along with its meaning, shouldn’t the second amendment be reworded to modern meaning with the knowledge of difference in firepower/capability?

B. B. B. Baited

this is interesting coming from you of all individuals

It doesn't matter why it was "proposed". Not ratified, proposed.

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 21 2018 05:02pm

Something something battle of wits something unarmed person something something...

I'd take you on in a battle of wits, but I make it a policy never to take on anyone that is totally unarmed??



/e Or one of my personal favorites...


Don't ever get lost in thought; you're new there.




...neither are directed at you ofc.

This post was edited by Ghot on Nov 21 2018 05:25pm

coooool