lol chit



orange REEEEEEEEE



which side is all jabbed up with the trump juice?

its not just any ol line .. its the orange line.....



because the honest FBI sez so. aint no sell out like orange sell out



reminds me of this. birds of a feather really flock together?
Resurfaced Video is DEVASTATING to Joe Biden's Campaign, Exposes How Much of a LIAR He Is


This post was edited by TiStuff on Jun 12 2023 01:56am

you saying chit isnt evidence

flimsy azz chit shows how desperate they are and how cheaply TDS will sell out.

Pretty much nobody made that argument... because it's a ridiculous one and Hillary didn't have a personality cult behind her. Hillary wasn't prosecuted because the facts weren't sufficient to bring a prosecution. That's why Comey declined to prosecute, and it's why numerous AGs under Trump never brought a prosecution. It's not a secret why... Comey gave us his reasoning. You can disagree with his reasoning... and say that he set a higher standard than the language of the statute, or that even based on his standard the case should've been brought, but highly partisan AGs like Sessions and Barr apparently agreed with Comey.

Cultists aren't able to make these distinctions though. They wrongly believed in 2016 that Hillary was simply let off, they believe she obstructed when there wasn't sufficient evidence to prove that, and now that debunked position is being used to equate her situation with Trump's. They aren't the same, and that's why Trump is being treated differently. It's not that complicated.

Also, your position that it's "no big deal" when Trump and his people violate laws isn't relevant. We get it, you don't care, and you can't be reasoned out of that position, but in a courtroom what matters is the facts and the law, and clearly laws were violated here.

This post was edited by IceMage on Jun 12 2023 03:40am

Also this is a side point, but where has it been proven that Chinese hackers accessed Hillary's email server? You state this as a fact and all I can find are statements from the FBI and Senate investigators debunking it.

russia russia russia theres no bias...............GTFO


comedy gold


here is some shoes that were actually marketed to lefties.........i wonder why lefties?


This post was edited by TiStuff on Jun 12 2023 03:54am

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html




There was nobody in washington who wanted to go after Hillary. Not Comey who had already been trying to rig the election against Trump, not self-interested Sessions, not ideal-minded Barr, but not the victorious Trump either. She was powerless and nobody had reason to try to drag our country into a mudfight over her. I don't know why you resist that concept so much, especially when it applies to Barr who wrote an entire book about how he abhors political prosecutions.



Okay, explain to me why it should be a big deal. Who is the victim, what were the stakes? What risk did America suffer that is somehow so much greater than the precedent I provided you, the Andrew Mays example where perhaps 800+ sailors lost their lives due to his breach. Where he wasn't prosecuted or even censured, but Trump deserves hundreds of years in prison. I want to know why I should care so much if Donald Trump actually did show a classified document to some yahoo PAC head, revealing irrelevant information to some nobody. The rumor is that Trump whipped out some document Milley gave him to show how wrong Milley was about something and complain about his incompetency. For some reason I feel our national security is more threatened by Mark Milley in that scenario

The difference between you and me is that I actually believe in that ideal of a common civility in our politics that you pretend to. And that isn't served by having weaponized secret police trying to get up the ass of every opposition party politician who jaywalks on an empty street. We've had this theme going for how many years now? The Russiaburger, Muellerburger, Koi Fish Burger?

This post was edited by Goomshill on Jun 12 2023 04:25am

Jack Smith would NEVER tamper or stretch the rules to fit his case.. no never.

Side note to get a grand jury to indict is the lowest standard

Those rules would apply to people who aren’t head of the executive branch. The constitution is the highest law in the land it is very clear on the powers of the president.