d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Tucker Being Fired Will Fix Fox News ?
Prev1252627282939Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 92,960
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Apr 27 2023 11:09am
Quote (Meanwhile @ Apr 27 2023 09:12am)
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tucker-carlson-fired-fox-news-twitter-video-texts-b2327835.html

Meanwhile, new theories continue to emerge about what led to his firing including the discovery of a video of Carlson making inappropriate comments about women.
In the video, obtained by The New York Times, Carlson discusses whether his “postmenopausal fans” would like how he looks on his show. In another video, he refers to a woman as “yummy”.

==> IMHO He made one of the oldest mistake: Too much confidence in himself, which is a classic for TV star.


this is all really smoke and mirrors.

Carlson is america's highest viewed news show, but he's expensive. even if they can only get 50% of the viewers with a new host they can likely pay them 10% of Tucker's salary. they've been waiting for a while to oust him because cable news is a dying business and they need to downsize. they did it for years with pretty blond anchors, as soon as they built a name and brand for themselves they were out. O'Reilly wanted to much cash and he was replaced.

these stories are being used as an excuse, "he's anti trump", "he's anti fox news", "he's anti women", etc etc etc. all of these could easily have been ignored if he was worth the money, and he's not.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Apr 27 2023 12:26pm
Quote (thesnipa @ 27 Apr 2023 19:09)
this is all really smoke and mirrors.

Carlson is america's highest viewed news show, but he's expensive. even if they can only get 50% of the viewers with a new host they can likely pay them 10% of Tucker's salary. they've been waiting for a while to oust him because cable news is a dying business and they need to downsize. they did it for years with pretty blond anchors, as soon as they built a name and brand for themselves they were out. O'Reilly wanted to much cash and he was replaced.

these stories are being used as an excuse, "he's anti trump", "he's anti fox news", "he's anti women", etc etc etc. all of these could easily have been ignored if he was worth the money, and he's not.


the 762M and incoming Smartmatic could be added to the equation no ?
Member
Posts: 4,621
Joined: Jan 30 2021
Gold: 751.50
Apr 27 2023 12:39pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 27 2023 07:09pm)
this is all really smoke and mirrors.

Carlson is america's highest viewed news show, but he's expensive. even if they can only get 50% of the viewers with a new host they can likely pay them 10% of Tucker's salary. they've been waiting for a while to oust him because cable news is a dying business and they need to downsize. they did it for years with pretty blond anchors, as soon as they built a name and brand for themselves they were out. O'Reilly wanted to much cash and he was replaced.

these stories are being used as an excuse, "he's anti trump", "he's anti fox news", "he's anti women", etc etc etc. all of these could easily have been ignored if he was worth the money, and he's not.


weird situation imo, he may not be worth the money for fox, but in these times tucker can make significantly more with his own platform
Member
Posts: 92,960
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Apr 27 2023 01:00pm
Quote (JohnnyMcCoy @ Apr 27 2023 01:39pm)
weird situation imo, he may not be worth the money for fox, but in these times tucker can make significantly more with his own platform


eh. i dont think he can. Tucker got $20m per year.

He might be able to build a Rumble/Youtube/Patreon brand of his own that makes that much or more in gross income, but the cost to him will be pretty big for a start up. cameras, studio, editing, admins, web design, etc.

If he's smart IMO he'll just make a 1 camera weekly show where he does his fox show, talking at a camera, very little editing, film it and upload. sell some cheap merch, and enjoy retirement.
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 27 2023 01:46pm
Quote (JohnnyMcCoy @ 27 Apr 2023 20:39)
weird situation imo, he may not be worth the money for fox, but in these times tucker can make significantly more with his own platform


can you elaborate? how can he make "significantly more" than being the best paid host on the largest "news" channel in america? i think if it was that easy, he would have left on his own...

if he wanted to hurt faux, he'd join a competing right wing outlet (oann / daily wire) and i'm sure he'd draw a large part of his viewer base to them - but neither of them could pay him even remotely what he got on faux.
i have a feeling that's not his ambition though, i think he will go into politics, maybe even run for president while making "commentary" his side gig, the promotion of white nationalism his platform.
Member
Posts: 105,133
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Apr 27 2023 01:57pm




Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Apr 27 2023 02:31pm
Member
Posts: 56,374
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 572,210.49
Apr 27 2023 02:36pm
Free speech and all that. what a time to be alive. :rolleyes:

This post was edited by ferdia on Apr 27 2023 02:36pm
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 27 2023 02:59pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Apr 27 2023 06:36am)
ukraine = bad doesn't undo russia = bad, or even russia = worse.

Ukraine has been under the Russian sphere of influence for a century or more. they are the way they are (corrupt, violent, etc) because Russia allowed them to be, they wanted them to be that way. Russia shares more share of the blame for what Ukraine is than any other nation. we have been fucking with them since like 2010, Russia's been fucking with them since 1910. we are not the same.


Most sane people would agree that both Russia & Ukraine are fucked up. Both of these countries have gone in a bad direction after the collapse of the USSR
Member
Posts: 34,186
Joined: May 25 2007
Gold: 21.00
Warn: 10%
Apr 27 2023 03:03pm
Quote (fender @ Apr 27 2023 12:46pm)
can you elaborate? how can he make "significantly more" than being the best paid host on the largest "news" channel in america? i think if it was that easy, he would have left on his own...

if he wanted to hurt faux, he'd join a competing right wing outlet (oann / daily wire) and i'm sure he'd draw a large part of his viewer base to them - but neither of them could pay him even remotely what he got on faux.
i have a feeling that's not his ambition though, i think he will go into politics, maybe even run for president while making "commentary" his side gig, the promotion of white nationalism his platform.


yeah there is no way that Tucker can make more money now. Those primetime hosts get paid ridiculous amounts of money.

Not that it should matter, if Tucker wasn't dumb with his money he has far more than enough money to do anything he wants for the rest of his life
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1252627282939Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll