d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Lgbt Terrorist Attack Against Christian Children
Prev1252627282952Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Mar 28 2023 12:30pm
Quote (Santara @ Mar 28 2023 11:23am)
We have a problem with sensationalism. CNN birthed the 24/7 news cycle that makes these monsters famous. We would do well to let them die anonymous, ignominious deaths. Make their efforts at achieving fame futile. Like is noted here:


Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 28 2023 08:42am)
the handgun vs rifle debate in the context of school shootings is like asking if a hot machete or hot katana go through butter more efficiently.

if we want to stop school shootings without butchering 2a, we need to filet 1a, and pass a law making it illegal to publish the face, name, manifesto, message, or social media posts of any shooter post shooting.


Seeing these posts give me hope. Been saying this for years, mostly to apathetic ears.
Member
Posts: 92,960
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 28 2023 12:35pm
Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Mar 28 2023 01:22pm)
This is a weird level of autism for you. We both know language is emotionally loaded and not based on utilitarian rules of use.


the evolution of language isn't an issue, agenda driven evolution is my issue with it. whether its left or right. if language evolves organically or due to actual relevant changing context, good and fine. if it's changed abruptly to try and push an agenda that's not good, and should be discouraged.

Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 28 2023 01:28pm)
I don't think they'll change their mind unless they see it as harmful themselves, "violence" aside; I agree. What I'm saying though is that people 1) Do not think they're causing any harm, and 2) Do not see the extent of the harm that is being done. One can formulate all kinds of strategic ways to decimate a person, community, or country without doing anything directly physical.

To poison the water system of a town you dislike is incredibly violent. It is also incredibly violent if you, as part of your role at the county water board, willfully allow the discovery of poisoned water to persist without recourse or notification because you are happy to see the affected town get sick and die. There's no physical activity in the second example, and it is a form of violence by inaction imo.



Time will tell, to be sure. I don't think it unreasonable that trans people have this concern or thought though.


i have no issues with presenting people with the harm their nonviolent words and actions cause. in fact i fully support it.

when people cheaply say "what you said is violent" that is in fact IMO a way to avoid doing the work. why connect the dots when you can elude to a marginalized group that has a documented history of facing physical violence and just say "see, u did this". its hacktivism.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Mar 28 2023 12:35pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Mar 28 2023 12:38pm
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Mar 28 2023 12:43pm
Quote (thesnipa @ Mar 28 2023 11:35am)

i have no issues with presenting people with the harm their nonviolent words and actions cause. in fact i fully support it.

when people cheaply say "what you said is violent" that is in fact IMO a way to avoid doing the work. why connect the dots when you can elude to a marginalized group that has a documented history of facing physical violence and just say "see, u did this". its hacktivism.


It can be difficult to speak about an individual's behavior without also invoking the violent system and history that that behavior, or even simple viewpoint, stems from.
Member
Posts: 13,313
Joined: May 20 2004
Gold: 253.00
Mar 28 2023 12:45pm
Quote (fender @ Mar 28 2023 01:38pm)



https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/child-health.htm


If you make claim post an actual source you hack
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Mar 28 2023 12:45pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 28 2023 03:28pm)

Time will tell, to be sure. I don't think it unreasonable that trans people have this concern or thought though.


No but the language used to discuss this and the reporting on it has been quite unreasonable and does more to hurt transgender people than help them in the long run IMO. Reminds me of the boy who cried wolf, and if you will remember, that ended poorly for the boy.
Member
Posts: 22,437
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 96.11
Mar 28 2023 12:48pm
Quote (DizzyBusiness @ Mar 28 2023 11:45am)
No but the language used to discuss this and the reporting on it has been quite unreasonable and does more to hurt transgender people than help them in the long run IMO. Reminds me of the boy who cried wolf, and if you will remember, that ended poorly for the boy.


I think it's because we've seen where this has gone before. Invoking "concern of children" has been a primary angle taken by anti-LGBTQ+ people since, well, forever. It starts off by being about "drag" and how someone who is "in drag" shouldn't be around children. What do we do then with the transgender K-12 teachers?
Member
Posts: 15,940
Joined: Jun 27 2010
Gold: 102,354.50
Mar 28 2023 12:48pm
Quote (fender @ Mar 28 2023 08:38pm)


Why you exclude almost all other countries?
Member
Posts: 92,960
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
Mar 28 2023 12:55pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 28 2023 01:43pm)
It can be difficult to speak about an individual's behavior without also invoking the violent system and history that that behavior, or even simple viewpoint, stems from.


there are competing forces. one side trying to hackily label anything they dont like violence, broadly expand definitions of racism, sexism, transphobia, etc. the other side seizing on this clearly silly argument to convince the right that sexism, racism, etc no longer matter at all as labels. meanwhile the concept of benign racism doesnt exist anymore, that being behavior that you shouldnt do but also shouldnt get u fired from your job. there's no grey area left lol. its either 100% ok or you're basically hitler to a lot of people.

social media and cellphones are excellent tools for societal change, we have a natural environment where people fear repercussions. we can use this for good or for evil, and i just see too much evil is all.
Member
Posts: 4,147
Joined: Jun 30 2022
Gold: 6.42
Warn: 10%
Mar 28 2023 01:05pm
Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 28 2023 03:48pm)
I think it's because we've seen where this has gone before. Invoking "concern of children" has been a primary angle taken by anti-LGBTQ+ people since, well, forever. It starts off by being about "drag" and how someone who is "in drag" shouldn't be around children. What do we do then with the transgender K-12 teachers?


Where has it gone before? Has there been many instances of drag being criminalized in a disguised attempt to crackdown on transgender people? That seems very vague

I don't think it is crazy at all for a parent to not be comfortable with their child being taught by someone who is transgender, especially given how divisive an issue it is now and because the LGBT community does a horrible job at policing the behavior of people within it while also pushing back against any criticisms from outside of the community.

Also, if trans issues cannot be talked about separately from the LGBTQ+ community how can you blame people for ascribing sexual connotations to transgenderism? Don't you see the issue there?

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1252627282952Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll