Quote (NetflixAdaptationWidow @ Mar 28 2023 01:22pm)
This is a weird level of autism for you. We both know language is emotionally loaded and not based on utilitarian rules of use.
the evolution of language isn't an issue, agenda driven evolution is my issue with it. whether its left or right. if language evolves organically or due to actual relevant changing context, good and fine. if it's changed abruptly to try and push an agenda that's not good, and should be discouraged.
Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 28 2023 01:28pm)
I don't think they'll change their mind unless they see it as harmful themselves, "violence" aside; I agree. What I'm saying though is that people 1) Do not think they're causing any harm, and 2) Do not see the extent of the harm that is being done. One can formulate all kinds of strategic ways to decimate a person, community, or country without doing anything directly physical.
To poison the water system of a town you dislike is incredibly violent. It is also incredibly violent if you, as part of your role at the county water board, willfully allow the discovery of poisoned water to persist without recourse or notification because you are happy to see the affected town get sick and die. There's no physical activity in the second example, and it is a form of violence by inaction imo.
Time will tell, to be sure. I don't think it unreasonable that trans people have this concern or thought though.
i have no issues with presenting people with the harm their nonviolent words and actions cause. in fact i fully support it.
when people cheaply say "what you said is violent" that is in fact IMO a way to avoid doing the work. why connect the dots when you can elude to a marginalized group that has a documented history of facing physical violence and just say "see, u did this". its hacktivism.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Mar 28 2023 12:35pm