1. use google
2. Trying to redefine capitalism as needing 'protection from the state' and saying capitalism without a state isn't capitalism to try to prove that capitalism can only happen with a state isn't going to cut it.
Quote
The fact is that the only way you can reasonably say to "own" something is if you have the ability to exclude others from it. In absence of a larger entity such as the state that is dependent on your own ability to exert force against others attempting to use it. As such any system in absence of a state can hardly be called capitalist, since your "property" only exists due to the force you can exert, and not any kind of collectively agreed right to property.
No. People own things all around the world with varying abilities to keep them safe from robbers. people steal things all the time.
Nor is a state is the only way to defend your property. You have disproved your own position by saying 'such as the state' implying there are alternate entities to protect property.
Whether its gun ownership, a baseball bat, locked doors, private security, defense organizations, etc.
https://mises.org/library/private-production-defense'Collective agreement' is not required, nor is collective agreement a government. Nor does inability to perfectly defend your property mean capitalism is impossible.
People can voluntarily agree to peacefully coexist. I know you guys are leftists, but thats a real thing that can happen. mind blown, i know.
Think about this for a little bit.
If you are in a community with no government is the possibility for private ownership and trade for profit impossible?
Or would that be very likely as people see the benefit of mutually beneficial trade? Did we not see private ownership and trade markets pop up all around the world throughout history?
Is that 'not real capitalism'?
Is there something magically preventing private ownership and trade? Or are you trying to impose your own definitions on capitalism to pretend its impossible without a state?
Rather than making capitalism possible, governments often infringe on private ownership and trade. Peaceful voluntary exchange does not need a coercive government interfering in order to be possible.
This post was edited by cambovenzi on Jan 14 2019 03:07am