Quote (Mangix @ May 5 2016 12:03pm)
If thats true, it implies that there are less republicans actually against trump, does it not? Unless by cross over you aren't meaning democrats and merely meaning typical non voters.
It would mean that, and also that there are simply
fewer Republicans, just based off of looking at the raw vote totals from the primary votes. That's the big mistake that people make when they, over and over again, look at those raw vote totals and try to make assumptions based off of them. They'll take a state like Michigan and think "oh my god, look at all these people voting for Trump and all the other Republicans, they got over 1.32 million votes. Clinton and Sanders only got 1.2 million, the Republicans are gonna win Michigan!!!111one"
And it's not entirely their fault for thinking that, because Trump himself is stupid enough to think it works that way and he repeats it constantly, and dumb/lazy media personalities repeat it too, but either way it isn't going to happen. But that's the danger in just assuming that because Republican primary turnout was higher this year, Trump was able to magically bring people into the political process to cast strictly positive votes.