This is fake. The video wasn't doctored. CNN just ran the lie so that ignorant leftists could act triumphant on the internet.

Kelly Anne Conway went on CNN and claimed [it was sped up, but that meant it wasn't doctored].

she could have, of course, been dealing with incorrect info from the Whitehouse. that happens basically daily.

speeding up a video is important to context, whether it was sped up seems lost to time. i searched for an answer last week and ran into a wall of "since deleted tweets" and the sourcing of sourcing.

is there an echo in here?

This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 21 2018 12:44pm

as if the fact that the administration chose to ban a journalist by acting like he assaulted an intern wasn't embarrassing enough already...

so you just run with the 'but right wing sources claim it wasn't doctored, just conveniently sped up at certain parts that made the interaction look more aggressive' narrative, and think that makes the white house look good somehow? hilarious...

lol. No worries. I dont claim to be some genius tho thats for sure but I dont think I am an idiot either. Short sighted sometimes maybe but not an idiot.

passionate incredulous hyperbole meant to be humorous would be how i'd describe most of your posts! enjoyable to be sure

The video posted by your "White House Deputy Press Secretary" was doctored.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Huckabee_Sanders

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2018/nov/08/fact-checking-misleading-video-sarah-sanders-used-/

The following day, in order to justify the White House's actions, Sanders released a video of the moment the intern tried to grab the microphone from Acosta's hand. The video originated from conspiracy theorist Paul Joseph Watson of the far-right website Infowars, and was allegedly altered to make Acosta seem aggressive and excluded him saying "Pardon me, ma'am" to the intern.


Meaning that like usual EndlessSky@d2sp you are spreading FALSE STATEMENTS.

Doctored (v) - change the content or appearance of (a document or picture) in order to deceive

The fps on the video changed as the result of being converted to a gif. The video wasn't doctored.

If Hannity did the same thing, there would be 100 page thread about it just like with Lewandowski accusing all Republicans of being misogynists. Now, you're arguing to downplay it instead because the logical conclusion would be antithetical to the narrative you support.

you never can help yourself with the silly narrative stuff, can you?

i said early and often that Acosta should be booted from the press core, but that by doing so they'll be playing into Acosta's hand. proven right by the skyrocket of his social media followers post-ban and the free press they've gotten for the court case. I don't like activist journalists, i consider Hannity and Acosta to both be too biased to get into a WH press briefing.

Trumpsters see Hillary and Acosta in their dreams.

I hear you a have a Hillary fathead on the wall of your master bedroom. Is this true?