Quote (fender @ Jan 4 2019 12:11pm)

cute attempt, but you're so desperate to disagree with me that you don't even realise the logical leaps you have to make and the facts you have to ignore, in order to fabricate an 'argument' in support of that obvious right wing spin:

nothing that the corporate democrats negotiating with trump support even suggests they question the LEGITIMACY OF HAVING A BORDER. that is pure fabrication, they have spoken out against illegal immigration AND supported policy to combat it on a regular basis, while in charge AND while in opposition.
so the claim that their general support for legal immigration somehow implied they "question the legitimacy of having borders at all" (remember, THAT is what blacky is arguing) - even though their expressed intentions AND legislative history clearly disprove that, is nothing short of idiotic.
i mean, i get why cultists and bigots fall for this kind of fear mongering and uncritically repeat it, i get why trump and the pundits on the right claim it in the first place - but that our interactions in the past have triggered you so hard that even YOU fall for this kind of propaganda, is almost a bit sad - although not entirely surprising.

again, there are NO FACTS supporting that stupid talking point - it's a transparent attempt deflect from the fact that trump initially supported a COMPROMISE including INCREASED funding for border security (just not outright billions for a WALL - that mexico was supposed to pay for anyway), and only withdrew that support after conservative pundits attacked him for it on his favourite tv and radio shows. that alone should expose the moronic attempt to portray this as an ideological fight between 'border safety' and 'open border' proponents as the lazy pivot that it is to halfway intelligent people, but apparently even such basic logical reasoning is lost on you nowadays...

Quote (thesnipa @ 4 Jan 2019 19:12)

did not read. if u want me to actually read dont start with the wordsalad bullshit, close with it. like i did, because im smart, and you're not.

Quote (fender @ Jan 4 2019 12:16pm)

laziest dodge ever, we both know you read every single word and that was the best reply you could think of because the facts just are not on your side. thanks for playing though, better luck next time...

Quote (thesnipa @ 4 Jan 2019 19:18)

self stroking off-topic blah blah

Quote (fender @ Jan 4 2019 12:24pm)

trying to prove my point here? but hey, maybe it's a good sign that you're so afraid to engage the topic, could mean you realise that you don't actually have a point and just posted because you're eternally butthurt, maybe not all hope is lost then...

Quote (thesnipa @ 4 Jan 2019 14:18)

not only did i not read, but i didnt even read the BOLD

you started off with some tosh about how i am desperate to prove you wrong or some such and i decided to just pass.

you spend a half hour typing that steaming pile, and i didnt even read it. tell us how that makes you feel, i might read that.

also i posted a minute after you did, its clear i didnt read it. even being a speedreader.

Quote (excellence @ Jan 4 2019 12:28pm)

:rofl:

Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 4 2019 02:57pm)

i made a simple point and you came back with 3 paragraphs with a snarky opener.

safe to assume that you didnt even read or take in my simple point, why would i bother engaging. let alone in the pictures thread.

and if im wrong whats the harm? missing a conversation with a guy that has a 3% rotten tomatoes score in PARD? awwww shucks.

Quote (Tuna_BeIIy @ Jan 4 2019 12:33pm)

I bet my RT score is 3% but the audience score is 80%, especially among based anti termite mods

Quote (thesnipa @ 4 Jan 2019 19:27)

i made a simple point and you came back with 3 paragraphs with a snarky opener.

safe to assume that you didnt even read or take in my simple point, why would i bother engaging. let alone in the pictures thread.

and if im wrong whats the harm? missing a conversation with a guy that has a 3% rotten tomatoes score in PARD? awwww shucks.