lol, goon once again pretending not to get the fundamental distinction between explaining and excusing, failing to realise that while an approach to the latter could indeed be just accepting the result, the former could be adequately addressed by tackling the reasons.
apparently that's just too difficult to tell apart. just like which group of people lives under a brutal foreign occupation, gets its resources stolen, its buildings bulldozed, its wells closed, its people abducted, tortured, and killed, its journalists murdered, and lacks basic needs and human rights - and which group lives in prosperity, freedom, and protected by literally trillions worth of equipment, which it uses to illegally occupy, discriminate, and oppress the other group. really strange how SOME people don't consider their struggles equal...
__________________________________________________________
Quote (IceMage @ 19 Oct 2023 01:48)
Why would we be appalled at that number? Hamas committed a terrorist attack, intentionally targeting civilians for kidnapping, rape, torture, and murder. Israel's response to bomb Hamas targets in Gaza is an entirely rational and legitimate military response. As long as Israel is intending to drop bombs on military targets, the resultant loss of innocent life is acceptable, and the moral blame belongs to the group of terrorists that the Palestinians allow to control Gaza.
If Israel were to launch a proportional response, they would intentionally target civilians and civilian deaths would be much worse.
do you genuinely believe that cutting water and electricity to millions of people already living in destitution "targets" hamas, or would you agree that measures like that will predictably hit the weak and the vulnerable the hardest?
who do you think has an easier time evacuating, re-locating and surviving from constant air bombardments of densely settled residential areas (there are no fix "military targets" in gaza that you can precision strike with bombs, or israel is just reeeeally bad at using all their equipment): hamas combatants, or families with young children and elderly people.
is there any building, any "target" within gaza that you would NOT characterise as somehow at least connected to or benefitting hamas, and thus a valid "military target"?
in other words, is there anything short of EXCLUSIVELY targeting and slaughtering children (something even the disgusting hamas terrorists did not, they indiscriminately killed everyone - just like israel) that the IDF could do, that you would consider illegitimate?
___________________________________________
there was this heavyweight boxer who abducted a child and kept it locked in a cell. one day, the kid kicked the boxer right between his legs - with all the strength it could muster, which actually hurt him quite considerably. so in reply, the boxer beat his little prisoner to a bloody pulp, didn't even break a sweat.
i guess the kid was lucky - since a "proportional response" would have been to ALSO use full strength, which would easily have killed the kid. after all, the little bugger "started it", and it was clearly a low blow too. also, if the kid were smart, it wouldn't have tried to hurt his jailer in the first place, and just accepted its destiny.it's good that we have people around who can put the slaughtering of thousands of innocent women and children (at the very least three times as many as the disgusting hamas terrorists murdered), into the appropriate context, and explain to us how palestinians are actually getting away easy, because a "proportional response" would "aCktShuaLLy" be slaughtering tens or even hundreds of thousands of kids.
#pro life
#team heavyweight
#no more groin kicks
This post was edited by fender on Oct 19 2023 12:18am