Isn't it premature to outright say collusion didn't occur?

I think it's unlikely that it occurred but still a possibility.

If the Trump campaign promised Russia an easing of sanctions/less sanctions in return for a Trump intermediary to coordinate anti-Clinton email leaks with WikiLeaks/Russia, would you label that as collusion?

Or if the Trump campaign promised Russia an easing of sanctions in exchange for a Trump Tower project in Moscow, would you label that as collusion?

Collusion cant occur because it isnt a real word. Democrats made it up to create a narrative of victimhood.

The first is a mistake, the second deserves the death penalty.

You mean collusion is not technically a crime under US federal law, correct? Because it's definitely a real word...

Regardless of whether or not collusion is a federal crime, 1) impeachment is a political process, not a legal one and 2) other items such as obstruction of justice and conspiracy to defraud the US, among other items, would still on the table.

If your only hope is a nigh impossible obstruction technicality that cuts against your case.

Collusion isnt real. If collusion was real, the media would be following Hillary for pay for play with Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Haiti & Barack Obama with Iran.

Its suspicious based on your coverage, you just cover a one sided investigation based on your own desired results.

KEK 10/10 TRUE IRONY IN THIS KEKEKEKEK

I am also drunk right now

I'm torn between if you being intoxicated will make you a better poster since you may be able to ditch your obvious hangups, or a worse poster since it will make you think less.

On second thought, I think you can only improve.

This emoji gave me cancer wtf?

This post was edited by Jupe on Nov 30 2018 09:12pm