Quote (bogie160 @ 26 May 2022 01:44)
You picked the first link you came across, but as to what the methodology is, you have no idea. Is this how you source most of your information?
People are jailed when they commit crimes. Drug offenses are crimes. The war on drugs was very popular when it launched, and it received the full-throated support of the NAACP, terrified by what drugs were doing to black neighborhoods. Sometimes well-intentioned laws have bad consequences. But that's only a piece of the incarceration problem. Fundamentally, to decrease the incarcerated population, you either need to reduce sentencing or reduce crime. Reduced sentencing is suitable in select cases, but not as a rule, as NYC and others are finding out. So to reduce incarceration, we need to reduce crime. Which at the end of the day means more policing, not less.
what part of "they all come to similar conclusions, with the US reliably ranking well below the freest countries (many of which european)" do you not understand?
also, if you had the slightest clue about the actual motives and background of the war on drugs, how and where it was enforced, the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine, you'd be embarrassed to even try and portray it as "well-intentioned law". it might have been sold as such, but the reality is so much darker. do some research, buddy.
again, my main point: your guns do not contribute in any positive way to whatever actual "freedom" you have, quite the opposite...