You clarified your position and in doing so proved me right. You seem to be the only person who can't see it, which isn't surprising since you consistently act like the only way somebody can accurately represent your position is by repeating your own words verbatim.

The easiest way for you to prove that I mischaracterized you is to give me the counter-example I've been asking for. The fact that you won't is pretty good evidence that I was right and you're running the fuck away because you know it.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 28 2019 10:19am

Incorrect. Read slower and try to rub some brain cells together to figure it out.
Being a libertarian and criticizing the governments funding of solyndra doesn't mean i said everything the government does is "waste regardless of consequence"

Blatantly misrepresenting what I said is a far cry from merely not quoting what I said verbatim. You fundamentally misrepresented what I said in a years old conversation to detract from valid criticism of the warfare state now. Scummy.


Not playing your game isnt proof you were right moron. Try looking at what i said and see if it matches up with what you falsely claimed I said.

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Oct 28 2019 10:24am

Yep, you're right. Being a libertarian and criticizing a specific policy doesn't mean you said everything the government does is a waste regardless of consequence.

It just so happens that in addition to those things, you did take the position that it's a waste regardless of consequence. That's extra.

When you gave some of your reasons for why you think this specific case is a waste you said "-Resources were diverted from productive market-based ends into businesses selected by the government", which can be applied to any government expenditure, and therefore would mean you consider all expenditures a waste.

If I am wrong and there are government expenditures you don't think are a waste based on that reasoning then list a single one and I'll admit I was mischaracterizing your position. But until you do that your dodging is great evidence that I'm making an appropriate characterization.

valid criticism of the welfare state hurts people like little fella thor (he cannot feed himself without state subsidy or mommie-in-law paying for it) which is why he spams f5 on this page to twist people’s posts

case closed. you can fuck off now.

Mental midget Thor123422 cannot accept he was wrong about the government funding of solyndra being a waste from a conversation years ago

lies about what happened to this day. sad.

Intellectual coward Cam can't handle the fact that people would accurately describe his position. Oh, and on top of that refusing to read the rest then knocking over the pieces in rage from the guy who constantly yells about honesty. Classic Cam.

I think the government doing X is bad because Y
Y can apply to all government actions
WHY WOULD YOU SAY THAT I THINK ALL GOVERNMENT ACTIONS ARE BAD REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 28 2019 10:34am

I accurately pointed out you lied about what I said and mischaracterized a debate from years ago to detract from discussion now.
You don't have the integrity to admit you were wrong. Pathetic.

All it takes is you giving me a single government expenditure that you don't consider to be a misallocation and you will have successfully given a direct contradiction to my position. Until you do that you haven't shown me to be incorrect, and every time you post refusing to do so it just adds to the pile of evidence that I am correct.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 28 2019 10:42am

No example is required to contradict your position. We can simply look at what I said and see if you lied about it, which you did.