d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Hillary 2016
Prev1242526272839Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 41,259
Joined: Apr 14 2006
Gold: 2,738.71
May 11 2016 10:57am
Sad that this election will really turn into which candidate do we hate less. We joke that it's always the situation, but never to this magnitude. You have a huge portion of moderates that despise both of these candidates every time their mouths are moving. I cannot wait for the debates lol
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
May 11 2016 11:49am
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ 11 May 2016 11:29)
She's got a pretty good track record of getting shit done, honestly. The Iran deal wouldn't have happened without her, for instance.

She's also got a proven track record on women's health issues and pushing back against the Republican agenda of fucking with women's health because some women preachers in like 44 AD were against abortion and now every Christian thinks its Jesus' idea.

Her ideas for funding college and slashing student loan interest and the like are great. She's got pretty decent views on guns and whatnot that aren't too onerous to gun ownership.

Generally speaking, she's got an agenda that I more or less agree with and actually has a chance of making deals that end up with anything happening. Even at the earliest moments, the Bernie campaign has always clearly clung to pie-in-the-sky deals that would get his face laughed in by Congress.


I think that what gets lost in the discussion about Bernie Sanders is that he is not an idealogue. He advocates for very far left ideas like subsidized tuition for state schools, but he's not going to turn down legislation that simply reduces the interest rate on federal student loans.

So while he does advocate for very progressive policy that isn't likely to reach the floor of Congress, he's still going to take what he can get and his administration will still help move America in a progressive direction. That's proven by his voting record.

His administration may veto more bills than a HRC administration but that's mainly because he differs on financial regulation issues and surveillance issues, two things establishment Democrats and Republicans have litttle problem agreeing with.
Member
Posts: 33,771
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
May 11 2016 12:03pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ May 11 2016 06:49pm)
I think that what gets lost in the discussion about Bernie Sanders is that he is not an idealogue. He advocates for very far left ideas like subsidized tuition for state schools, but he's not going to turn down legislation that simply reduces the interest rate on federal student loans.

So while he does advocate for very progressive policy that isn't likely to reach the floor of Congress, he's still going to take what he can get and his administration will still help move America in a progressive direction. That's proven by his voting record.

His administration may veto more bills than a HRC administration but that's mainly because he differs on financial regulation issues and surveillance issues, two things establishment Democrats and Republicans have litttle problem agreeing with.


Bernie Sanders isnt far left
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
May 11 2016 12:04pm
Quote (dro94 @ 11 May 2016 13:03)
Bernie Sanders isnt far left


As far as American politics go, he is. For a major presidential candidate.
Member
Posts: 33,771
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
May 11 2016 12:08pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ May 11 2016 07:04pm)
As far as American politics go, he is. For a major presidential candidate.


In America, yeah. But in America close to half the country support a party that thinks killing the families of terrorists is a great idea
Member
Posts: 16,993
Joined: Sep 18 2010
Gold: 28,044.60
May 11 2016 01:11pm
Quote (dro94 @ May 11 2016 07:08pm)
In America, yeah. But in America close to half the country support a party that thinks killing the families of terrorists is a great idea


That isn't as bad an idea as you may think. One of the reasons the west is losing the war on terror is they play by a rulebook that the enemy doesn't adhere to.

Terrorists have no problems killing the families on innocent people. Since we're so soft, every attack they commit is a win-win situation. If they do it and get away, then their people view them as heroes. If they do it and get captured/killed, they believe they achieve martyrdom and take solace in knowing their families won't be hurt and they'll go to "heaven".

Unfortunately, I think the only way to stop terrorism is to do some very nasty things to those involved, knowing damn well that if the roles were reversed, the enemy would have no problem doing the same (or worse) to you. The families of terrorists aren't very likely to be totally innocent either. They most likely know what's being planned and that people are going to die, but they don't report it or condemn it. They sit and cheer the terrorists along.

Israel has had a HUGE problem with terrorism, considering they're surrounded by nations that inherent hate Jews. For centuries they've had to deal with terrorism, and have become pretty good at it. They built a huge wall, don't allow Muslim migrants, and punish terrorists extremely severely. There was a recent article mentioning how Israelis will take a captured terrorist and put pig meat all over his body to make sure he dies disgraced and doesn't reach the heaven he believes in. They'll also go after the family in a very strong manner. It's a terrible thing to do, but it works. You can't win a war by being politically correct and limiting yourself to a set of rules the enemy surely won't adhere to.
Member
Posts: 33,771
Joined: May 9 2009
Gold: 3.33
May 11 2016 02:11pm
Quote (EA7 @ May 11 2016 08:11pm)
That isn't as bad an idea as you may think. One of the reasons the west is losing the war on terror is they play by a rulebook that the enemy doesn't adhere to.

Terrorists have no problems killing the families on innocent people. Since we're so soft, every attack they commit is a win-win situation. If they do it and get away, then their people view them as heroes. If they do it and get captured/killed, they believe they achieve martyrdom and take solace in knowing their families won't be hurt and they'll go to "heaven".

Unfortunately, I think the only way to stop terrorism is to do some very nasty things to those involved, knowing damn well that if the roles were reversed, the enemy would have no problem doing the same (or worse) to you. The families of terrorists aren't very likely to be totally innocent either. They most likely know what's being planned and that people are going to die, but they don't report it or condemn it. They sit and cheer the terrorists along.

Israel has had a HUGE problem with terrorism, considering they're surrounded by nations that inherent hate Jews. For centuries they've had to deal with terrorism, and have become pretty good at it. They built a huge wall, don't allow Muslim migrants, and punish terrorists extremely severely. There was a recent article mentioning how Israelis will take a captured terrorist and put pig meat all over his body to make sure he dies disgraced and doesn't reach the heaven he believes in. They'll also go after the family in a very strong manner. It's a terrible thing to do, but it works. You can't win a war by being politically correct and limiting yourself to a set of rules the enemy surely won't adhere to.


The president won't even name the enemy. How can you defeat an enemy you don't name? If he looks in the mirror and says 'radical islamic terrorists' 3 times, ISIS go down in a blaze of glory
Member
Posts: 112,095
Joined: Jul 25 2008
Gold: 40.42
May 11 2016 03:33pm
Lol but seriously, what kind of pathetic coward do you have to be to think that your safety is worth murdering children?
Member
Posts: 49,872
Joined: Dec 23 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 11 2016 07:11pm
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ May 11 2016 04:33pm)
Lol but seriously, what kind of pathetic coward do you have to be to think that your safety is worth murdering children?


you seem to be misinformed badly read EA7 comment again it's perfect outline of how to counter punch ISIS
Member
Posts: 49,893
Joined: Jun 19 2006
Gold: 3.88
May 11 2016 08:08pm
Quote (stimpy6298 @ May 12 2016 12:11pm)
you seem to be misinformed badly read EA7 comment again it's perfect outline of how to counter punch ISIS


I could not care less if it is a workable strategy, its a low life cowards way and anyone who thinks attacking your enemies families is a valid way to wage war disgusts me.
It is also not a great strategy, because wars are won in the minds of the general populace, this kind of behavior is why america lost vietnam, american troops were perceived as baby killers and the population turned on them.


This post was edited by Plaguefear on May 11 2016 08:11pm
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1242526272839Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll