d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Santorum Wants To Ban Internet Porn > This Is Not A Joke
Prev1242526272831Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: May 8 2010
Gold: 0.00
Mar 19 2012 09:28pm
Quote (thundercock @ Mar 19 2012 03:15am)
You know I was thinking about that the other day.  It does seem bizarre that I would be more comfortable exposing kids to violence instead of sex/drugs.  However, I think it's because violence is so unrealistic/unlikely to happen that it's ok to expose kids to it.


So it's OK to expose it to them just because it's unrealistic?

Tentacle porn is also unrealistic, must also be OK then.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Mar 19 2012 09:30pm
Quote (Ricelol @ Mar 20 2012 03:28am)
So it's OK to expose it to them just because it's unrealistic?

Tentacle porn is also unrealistic, must also be OK then.


I didn't say it was ok. I just said I'd be more comfortable with it and gave an idea why I am more comfortable with it. I honestly don't know why.
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: May 8 2010
Gold: 0.00
Mar 19 2012 09:34pm
'Murica - where it's OK to show peoples' lives taken from them violently and for no reason but it's not OK to show life being created out of a loving relationship.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Mar 19 2012 09:36pm
Quote (Ricelol @ Mar 20 2012 03:34am)
'Murica - where it's OK to show peoples' lives taken from them violently and for no reason but it's not OK to show life being created out of a loving relationship.


Yes, because an Asian woman being penetrated by 17 cocks the size of my leg is love. Give me a break.

Neither is appropriate to show children.
Member
Posts: 11,748
Joined: Jun 17 2007
Gold: 450.00
Mar 19 2012 09:39pm
The government should not intervene on the internet outside of the realm of fraud/Child porn/etc.

If you're concerned with children accessing porn, censor your internet locally, monitor what your kids do, or don't get internet.
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: May 8 2010
Gold: 0.00
Mar 19 2012 09:39pm
Quote (thundercock @ Mar 19 2012 10:36pm)
Yes, because an Asian woman being penetrated by 17 cocks the size of my leg is love.  Give me a break.

Neither is appropriate to show children.


But I said it is MORE acceptable to show violent and pointless deaths. That's the whole point. You can watch people get shot in the head in PG-13 movies, but if you want to see a penis, you better be at least 17+!
Member
Posts: 3,728
Joined: Jan 24 2007
Gold: 212.00
Mar 19 2012 09:54pm
Should be the parent that stops underage kids from viewing. if you cant do that then you are a shitty parent.
Member
Posts: 20,217
Joined: Mar 20 2007
Gold: 431.00
Mar 19 2012 10:43pm
For all the good that porn does in the world, I say that banning it would bring a reality check to a lot of disenfranchised/loser dudes. Women would probably have the biggest victory because there's be a lot of depraved weirdos trying their damnedest to get laid. You can imagine that the std/pregnancy rate would explode. A world without our collective and compulsive use of porn would be a hilarious place.

edit: I would only allow a porn ban if it was also a crime for a fat chick to expose more than 40% of her skin area.

This post was edited by general_patton on Mar 19 2012 10:48pm
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Mar 19 2012 11:17pm
Quote (general_patton @ Mar 20 2012 04:43am)
For all the good that porn does in the world, I say that banning it would bring a reality check to a lot of disenfranchised/loser dudes. Women would probably have the biggest victory because there's be a lot of depraved weirdos trying their damnedest to get laid. You can imagine that the std/pregnancy rate would explode. A world without our collective and compulsive use of porn would be a hilarious place.

edit: I would only allow a porn ban if it was also a crime for a fat chick to expose more than 40% of her skin area.


*salute*
Member
Posts: 31,209
Joined: Sep 26 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 19 2012 11:29pm
Quote (shay11 @ Mar 18 2012 07:46am)
There would need to be if internet porn was banned, no?


I'm just saying porn should just be accepted. We don't need rules about it because art is so subjective. States shouldn't be able to define what is and isn't art, especially since no lawmaker is an expert and has poor taste. For fuck's sake, Thomas Kinkade used to be the richest living artist in the world before being exposed as a con.

Quote (thundercock @ Mar 19 2012 12:15am)
You know I was thinking about that the other day.  It does seem bizarre that I would be more comfortable exposing kids to violence instead of sex/drugs.  However, I think it's because violence is so unrealistic/unlikely to happen that it's ok to expose kids to it.


It's unlikely that a woman will be penetrated by multiple penises in all of her holes by a cock battalion lead by Ron Jeremy. Both are fantasy and both are inappropriate to show a child. If a child is exposed to such material, parents should be absolutely clear about the difference between fiction and reality.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1242526272831Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll