Quote (Thor123422 @ 26 Apr 2011 13:36)
I never said I liked the idea that they talked about it but I'm saying it happens already and is clearly not a result of unisex bathrooms so the idea that they might see a penis or vagina is a non-issue.
I'm not using a what if I'm empirically stating that it is the way it is.
you just seem to be threatened by anything you weren't raised with. Your personal attacks in every post make it abundantly clear.
You are using that position to defend unisex bathrooms. That's like saying "kids threaten each other all the time, so obviously gun/knife laws aren't stopping kids from problems, so let's let them buy them at any age they want". Your anecdote is not only morally reprehensible, but wrong. You are also wrong in that not all kids are raised that way, or exposed to such, so it is no longer empirical. Even so, whether or not a child knows what sex is does not suddenly make them protected from a sex crime, which was the core argument of protection. Don't confuse this with knowing what genitalia or sex is, because that's not what anyone here besides you are saying.
You have no idea what or what I wasn't raised with, but feel free to make assumptions. Note that it doesn't make your argument stronger. I also did not personally attack you in that reply, nor have I in "every post". If you feel threatened, perhaps you should take a look at yourself and what you believe in. Just because you got called out, you don't have to be dramatic.
