d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Charlie Kirk Assassination
Prev12425262728194Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 3,046
Joined: Oct 1 2021
Gold: 1,979.01
Sep 10 2025 06:58pm
Are you serious? Get fucking BLASTED mate.


I have bad news for you son. Between Irina and Charlie in one week, this is a turning point and there's no going back.

More and more people know that it's not enough to say "you know, even though I disagree with what he said, political violence is unacceptable." It's just not enough. No statement is enough. You and your ideological kin will never be taught to value human life and even the midwits and normies know this. The things you do, the things you say, and who and what you are are symptoms of civilizational decay, a decay that begets itself. A disease on the human race.
Member
Posts: 3,044
Joined: Nov 24 2016
Gold: 4,818.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 10 2025 06:59pm
The truth is Beria had the easiest job ever. Inventing excuses to murder someone is actually trivial when you put any effort into it. Same with coming up with reasons to imprison them. That, and raping and murdering teenagers, he did a lot of that.
When you want to rationalize a reason to wish death on someone you disagree with, its just easy to come up with some vague excuse about diffuse harm caused by their ideas.
Show me the man, I'll show you the 100 people he's killed by saying something controversial.
God only knows that in their minds J K Rowling must have a higher kill count than Pol Pot right now.


You're making a mistake at assuming it's a direct equivalent in an argument, though. Often times people use figures like, Pol Pot or Hitler, (like you just did) to make a point, not make two things equal.
Member
Posts: 3,044
Joined: Nov 24 2016
Gold: 4,818.00
Warn: 10%
Sep 10 2025 07:00pm
I have bad news for you son. Between Irina and Charlie in one week, this is a turning point and there's no going back.

More and more people know that it's not enough to say "you know, even though I disagree with what he said, political violence is unacceptable." It's just not enough. No statement is enough. You and your ideological kin will never be taught to value human life and even the midwits and normies know this. The things you do, the things you say, and who and what you are are symptoms of civilizational decay, a decay that begets itself. A disease on the human race.


Why political violence? Why add the "political" qualifier? Why not all violence? Do you support war efforts? If so that's political violence, in my opinion.
Member
Posts: 57,220
Joined: Oct 14 2010
Gold: 57,480.92
Sep 10 2025 07:01pm
Shouldn't have tried to force judeo christian values down kids throats.
Their only values now a days are racism, misogyny, and general intolerance of anyone not straight and white
Member
Posts: 29,426
Joined: Mar 24 2011
Gold: 1,040.00
Warn: 40%
Sep 10 2025 07:01pm
Arguing that we shouldn’t bother with laws since criminals don’t follow them anyways probably isn’t the strongest argument.


It's one of the better arguments if you value your life.

I carry a gun when I go to Chicago because I won't risk a crack head trying to stab me with a sharp object dudes going straight to the shadow realm.

edit: In parts of Chicago you don't have to stop at a red light and a cop won't pull you over because the corner is so dangerous ain't nobody dumb enough to stop.

This post was edited by SwamiVivekananda on Sep 10 2025 07:02pm
Member
Posts: 15,051
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 25.00
Sep 10 2025 07:02pm
Shouldn't have tried to force judeo christian values down kids throats.
Their only values now a days are racism, misogyny, and general intolerance of anyone not straight and white


I thought most straight white people were “Christian”.
Member
Posts: 31,925
Joined: Sep 21 2007
Gold: 1,126.00
Sep 10 2025 07:02pm
Depends. Im absolutely against further weapon restrictions. Fully auto weapons are already illegal and there are new restrictions coming out daily. In fact I’d probably be murdered by law enforcement dying on that hill.

However a lot of great ideas have been mentioned on how to make sure more of the wrong people don’t get their hands on these weapons.

Some (but not all) of these ideas I liked include:

1. Stricter background checks. Currently criminal and NOT psychological history only factors in. I personally know a schizophrenic who legally owns a gun. That’s scary to me.

2. Clamp down on drugs.

3. Stricter laws on owning a firearm such as if you get caught with one not registered to you personally or your a felon and get caught with one the penalty needs to be much more than they get.

4. Classes. I don’t know if they still have these now but when I was a kid I had to take a gun safety class that included care, maintenance and handling training.

These are just a few there are a lot out there.


You have to go through a background check before they give you a gun. You have any better ideas for stricter background checks? What does this mean?

Like I said, criminals will always get their hands on guns. I don't even own one but I made sure my family member does so they can defend themselves. You need to think of the women man.
Member
Posts: 12,299
Joined: Jul 22 2007
Gold: 84.67
Warn: 10%
Sep 10 2025 07:02pm
I have bad news for you son. Between Irina and Charlie in one week, this is a turning point and there's no going back.

More and more people know that it's not enough to say "you know, even though I disagree with what he said, political violence is unacceptable." It's just not enough. No statement is enough. You and your ideological kin will never be taught to value human life and even the midwits and normies know this. The things you do, the things you say, and who and what you are are symptoms of civilizational decay, a decay that begets itself. A disease on the human race.


Only political violence of course. You do know another shooting happened today right? :rofl:
Member
Posts: 15,051
Joined: Sep 29 2021
Gold: 25.00
Sep 10 2025 07:03pm
You have to go through a background check before they give you a gun. You have any better ideas for stricter background checks? What does this mean?

Like I said, criminals will always get their hands on guns. I don't even own one but I made sure my family member does so they can defend themselves. You need to think of the women man.


That background check doesn’t include psychological diagnosis. Did you read that part?
Member
Posts: 31,925
Joined: Sep 21 2007
Gold: 1,126.00
Sep 10 2025 07:04pm
That background check doesn’t include psychological diagnosis. Did you read that part?


mb, ya I agree. Trans should also be once again noted as a mental illness. Insane that you can also give them a gun.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev12425262728194Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll