This is completely delusional

Quick Google search..

https://www.giftoflife.org/posts/post/can-a-blood-stem-cell-or-marrow-transplant-change-your-dna#:~:text=Since%20the%20change%20in%20DNA,the%20identity%20of%20the%20recipient.

This post was edited by El1te on Aug 14 2024 09:28pm

To be fair, the premise of what he is saying is very accurate to how the goal posts change when transphobia is involved.

It's not accurate though. Our position is exactly the same as Richard Dawkins' position: sex is completely binary and is rooted in DNA and gametes - this also carries over directly to reproductive organs, but extremely rare genetic disorders have always existed and we've never denied it. The exception doesn't invalidate the rule. If someone is born with 5 fingers, that doesn't invalidate the fact that humans have 4 fingers. A cat born without a dewclaw doesn't mean that cats don't have dewclaws. It means that it's possible for a cat to not have a dewclaw due to a genetic disorder. It's a disorder by definition. This is literally the same as every biologist until clown world came along and it became a danger to say out loud, less they be fired.

This post was edited by El1te on Aug 14 2024 09:42pm

You lot trying to pretend you have not spent the last ten years saying "2 genders penis and vagina" is peak fiction.
No one became a dna expert until imane khalef came along.
It was always "check their pants".
Intersex people are likely to make up 1.6% of the population, when you apply that to 8 billion people thats a MASSIVE number, its not an exception, its not much rarer than red hair.
In my country data shows it is LESS common to have red hair than an intersex condition, when i was working still i would probably see 2-3 gingers a day.
A good portion of people you share a bathroom with are probably intersex.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Aug 14 2024 09:45pm

It is you who is making stuff up in bad faith. You know what gametes are, but you're playing stupid.

I got warned last time i responded to a post like this so i will disagree and pass on replying further.

More like 0.018%.

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12476264/

Very rare.

Yeah because you have no argument without resorting to flaming and personal attacks 👍

I think the most apt way to dismiss the red herring arguments of mutations is that 99.999%+ of people conform 99.999%+ to a binary sex. If a story is about someone purporting to be magically non-conforming intersex, they aren't. Can probably count the total number of true cases in the world on that 4 fingered hand. Just because a biological male is born with a genital disorder doesn't change their sex, they still conform to a binary sex in their basic biology.

Ah yes, because if you ignore a bunch of intersex conditions like klinefelter which IS an intersex condition making males much more female in appearance intersex conditions become much rarer.
Like how if you ignore gun murders in america murder becomes a lot less common.

This post was edited by Plaguefear on Aug 14 2024 09:49pm