Quote (fender @ Nov 14 2018 02:45pm)
very true, but well, we can't possibly hold the most powerful man in the country to the same standard as a 'random congresswoman'...
he probably would just have claimed that he has the same reservations about trump (just somehow never brings them up).
who said it's virtue? you're strawmanning hard (again). you asked me what i thought made her 'qualified', and i listed a couple of points that came to my mind (none of which apply to trump btw). you're obviously free to disagree, but implying that anyone suggested it was virtuous to be unqualified is blatantly dishonest.
specific question:
do you think people should have unvirtuous qualifications for congresspeople?
if not, what's the distinction?
if someone asked: what qualifications do you have to be a pornstar?
the answers would be unvirtuous qualifications.
but for a member of the legislature, i'd hope their qualifications are all virtuous. virtue is highly subjective, but all of the positives to govern i can think of are bare minimum arguably virtuous.
how about we stop dipping and diving tho. her healhtcare plan costs 2x the budget, and she has zero clue how to pay for it, according to her. Thoughts? and how does this affect her virtuous or otherwise nature.
This post was edited by thesnipa on Nov 14 2018 02:50pm