to be fair, the house popular vote margin was R+7 in 94 and 2010, and will probably end up D+7ish in 2018. that a similar advantage by the democrats translated into less seat gains is due to gerrymandering and natural geographic disadvantages of the democratic coalition (self-sorting etc).

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Nov 8 2018 05:37pm

I agree that it's way too early to evaluate Obama or Trump. The effects of their decisions often extend many decades.

But the ratings aren't that divergent by political affiliation (certainly not relative to what you'd expect based on the polarized nature of popular politics). Liberals, independents, and conservatives all have Obama well above average, and all have Trump bottom 5.



I'm no historian or political scientist but I have a fairly positive view of him.

Reagan, on the other hand, not so much.



Yes, the woman who graduated cum laude from Boston University with a bachelor's degree in economics and international relations is economically illiterate.

This post was edited by Voyaging on Nov 8 2018 07:42pm

cum laude is laughable now, not sure why you highlighted it

Being in the top quartile is still relevant. To call someone economically illiterate who literally has an economics degree is just idiocy.

I italicized it because it's supposed to be italicized.

EndlessCry has a bachelors in chemistry and hes pretty clueless about basic chemistry.

I definitely wouldn't trust half of my class to answer basic chemistry questions 5 years out of the degree

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Nov 8 2018 08:14pm

29 and not going to live in DC until the taxpayer-funded position kicks in after graduating cum laude from BU

kek

Its 2018 and the left is defending the intelligence of Googley-eyes Cortez

She really is pretty stupid though. Smarter than Ghot, no doubt, but still an idiot. I'd imagine that several people on this forum would ravage her in a debate.