Quote (Beowulf @ 14 Sep 2018 03:51)
studied excess deaths you can find online more detailed info on how they went about it
it's not a firm number it could be less than the adopted or more but most outside of the Trump clan accept at the minimum hundreds and hundreds of deaths
it's not a smart fight for a guy trying to give himself an A+ response to a destroyed area full of devastated people
not smart as in the way he approached it like usual. His fans will pretend this will be some great chess move but it's a terrible leadership decision and not anything Republicans want to engage in heading into the midterms for sure
making it a -democrats are out to get me boo hoo- while denying deaths as people suffer isn't anything most on the right want anything to do with
well, the point is that the authorities and infrastructure on puerto rico were in shambles before the island got savaged by two major hurricanes in a row. even
if this would indeed have caused a big loss of lives, it would be no surprise. everybody with more than 2 brain cells understands that.
nitpicking about the actual numbers and how they were calculated is just a distraction that will go nowhere because no ordinary voter really cares. liberal partisans will treat all this as further confirmation for their unfavorable view of trump. conservative partisans will treat this as further confirmation for the "trump vs unfair fake news media"-narrative. moderates and swing voters wont care.
oh, and lets not pretend like the typical trump voter cares about deaths on Puerto Rico anyway. you claim that this is a losing narrative that wont end well for trump. imho, this wont make a dent in trumps approval with republicans and republican-leaning voters.
Quote (Goomshill @ 14 Sep 2018 05:12)
So according to their study, they found no significantly increased mortality rate in the census scenario for the months of the hurricane- just the normal season fluctuation, dipping down a bit if anything.
Their entire projection of 'increased mortality' comes from adjusting the population of the island downwards according to the displacement scenario.
This somehow transfers the cause of death to the hurricane, even if the people were simply elderly (77%+) who were dying anyway and chose not to leave the island in their last years.
So lets apply this same logic to a hypothetical scenario
Say we have the country of Elbonia, with 100,000 residents. The Elbonians are pseudoimmortals who cannot die before the age of 75, at which point they simply poof into dust. Every year 5,000 such Elbonians poof into dust, thereby having a death rate of 5% per year. And exact same birth rate. Yeah they age fast. Now lets say that in 2020, a Typhoon strikes the landlocked country of Elbonia. 0 people die as a direct result, because they're immortal. But 20,000 Elbonian residents of young age choose to voluntary leave Elbonia for Albania and live there thanks to the devastation. Now the population of Elbonia is 80,000, and 5,000 people die. The death rate has now 'jumped' to 6.25%, even though nobody extra died, people who weren't going to die left the shithole. The government of Elbonia then posts on social media about how thanks to the jump in death rate, they can estimate that 1000 excess Elbonians died in the Typhoon. Even though nobody died, not as a result of it or indirectly.
would you please stop it already? facts, math and stats are inherently racist and discriminatory and therefore shouldnt be considered. I repeat: R-A-C-I-S-T!!!!!!11111oneoneeleven
This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 14 2018 01:23am