d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1243824392440244124423169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 49,872
Joined: Dec 23 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 13 2018 08:36pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Sep 13 2018 09:33pm)
Shitpost are still shitposts though


you're out of your league donny
Member
Posts: 105,153
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Sep 13 2018 09:08pm
Quote (Beowulf @ Sep 13 2018 09:51pm)
studied excess deaths you can find online more detailed info on how they went about it

it's not a firm number it could be less than the adopted or more but most outside of the Trump clan accept at the minimum hundreds and hundreds of deaths

it's not a smart fight for a guy trying to give himself an A+ response to a destroyed area full of devastated people

not smart as in the way he approached it like usual. His fans will pretend this will be some great chess move but it's a terrible leadership decision and not anything Republicans want to engage in heading into the midterms for sure

making it a -democrats are out to get me boo hoo- while denying deaths as people suffer isn't anything most on the right want anything to do with




Here's the deal. Ya don't need "studies"... ya need either body count or verifiable missing bodies. No studying involved.
What's next, a study of how many states are in the United States? :/


/e Do you folks actually believe these crap articles that show up in the wild. I mean you do "think" about what you're reading, right?

This post was edited by Ghot on Sep 13 2018 09:11pm
Member
Posts: 50,173
Joined: Mar 19 2006
Gold: 4,082.59
Sep 13 2018 09:11pm
Quote (Ghot @ Sep 14 2018 03:08am)
Here's the deal. Ya don't need "studies" ya need either body count or verifiable missing bodies. Not studying involved.
What's next a study of how many states are in the United States? :/


don't need one, according to obama there are 57
Member
Posts: 50,932
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Sep 13 2018 09:12pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ Sep 13 2018 08:09pm)


So according to their study, they found no significantly increased mortality rate in the census scenario for the months of the hurricane- just the normal season fluctuation, dipping down a bit if anything.
Their entire projection of 'increased mortality' comes from adjusting the population of the island downwards according to the displacement scenario.
This somehow transfers the cause of death to the hurricane, even if the people were simply elderly (77%+) who were dying anyway and chose not to leave the island in their last years.

So lets apply this same logic to a hypothetical scenario
Say we have the country of Elbonia, with 100,000 residents. The Elbonians are pseudoimmortals who cannot die before the age of 75, at which point they simply poof into dust. Every year 5,000 such Elbonians poof into dust, thereby having a death rate of 5% per year. And exact same birth rate. Yeah they age fast. Now lets say that in 2020, a Typhoon strikes the landlocked country of Elbonia. 0 people die as a direct result, because they're immortal. But 20,000 Elbonian residents of young age choose to voluntary leave Elbonia for Albania and live there thanks to the devastation. Now the population of Elbonia is 80,000, and 5,000 people die. The death rate has now 'jumped' to 6.25%, even though nobody extra died, people who weren't going to die left the shithole. The government of Elbonia then posts on social media about how thanks to the jump in death rate, they can estimate that 1000 excess Elbonians died in the Typhoon. Even though nobody died, not as a result of it or indirectly.
Member
Posts: 154
Joined: May 10 2003
Gold: 204.60
Sep 13 2018 09:37pm
Quote (Plaquelord @ Sep 14 2018 02:36am)
you're out of your league donny


this
Member
Posts: 54,204
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Sep 14 2018 01:19am
Quote (Beowulf @ 14 Sep 2018 03:51)
studied excess deaths you can find online more detailed info on how they went about it

it's not a firm number it could be less than the adopted or more but most outside of the Trump clan accept at the minimum hundreds and hundreds of deaths

it's not a smart fight for a guy trying to give himself an A+ response to a destroyed area full of devastated people

not smart as in the way he approached it like usual. His fans will pretend this will be some great chess move but it's a terrible leadership decision and not anything Republicans want to engage in heading into the midterms for sure

making it a -democrats are out to get me boo hoo- while denying deaths as people suffer isn't anything most on the right want anything to do with


well, the point is that the authorities and infrastructure on puerto rico were in shambles before the island got savaged by two major hurricanes in a row. even if this would indeed have caused a big loss of lives, it would be no surprise. everybody with more than 2 brain cells understands that.
nitpicking about the actual numbers and how they were calculated is just a distraction that will go nowhere because no ordinary voter really cares. liberal partisans will treat all this as further confirmation for their unfavorable view of trump. conservative partisans will treat this as further confirmation for the "trump vs unfair fake news media"-narrative. moderates and swing voters wont care.

oh, and lets not pretend like the typical trump voter cares about deaths on Puerto Rico anyway. you claim that this is a losing narrative that wont end well for trump. imho, this wont make a dent in trumps approval with republicans and republican-leaning voters.

Quote (Goomshill @ 14 Sep 2018 05:12)
So according to their study, they found no significantly increased mortality rate in the census scenario for the months of the hurricane- just the normal season fluctuation, dipping down a bit if anything.
Their entire projection of 'increased mortality' comes from adjusting the population of the island downwards according to the displacement scenario.
This somehow transfers the cause of death to the hurricane, even if the people were simply elderly (77%+) who were dying anyway and chose not to leave the island in their last years.

So lets apply this same logic to a hypothetical scenario
Say we have the country of Elbonia, with 100,000 residents. The Elbonians are pseudoimmortals who cannot die before the age of 75, at which point they simply poof into dust. Every year 5,000 such Elbonians poof into dust, thereby having a death rate of 5% per year. And exact same birth rate. Yeah they age fast. Now lets say that in 2020, a Typhoon strikes the landlocked country of Elbonia. 0 people die as a direct result, because they're immortal. But 20,000 Elbonian residents of young age choose to voluntary leave Elbonia for Albania and live there thanks to the devastation. Now the population of Elbonia is 80,000, and 5,000 people die. The death rate has now 'jumped' to 6.25%, even though nobody extra died, people who weren't going to die left the shithole. The government of Elbonia then posts on social media about how thanks to the jump in death rate, they can estimate that 1000 excess Elbonians died in the Typhoon. Even though nobody died, not as a result of it or indirectly.


would you please stop it already? facts, math and stats are inherently racist and discriminatory and therefore shouldnt be considered. I repeat: R-A-C-I-S-T!!!!!!11111oneoneeleven

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Sep 14 2018 01:23am
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Sep 14 2018 05:27am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Sep 14 2018 12:19am)


oh, and lets not pretend like the typical trump voter cares about deaths on Puerto Rico anyway. you claim that this is a losing narrative that wont end well for trump. imho, this wont make a dent in trumps approval with republicans and republican-leaning voters.

would you please stop it already? facts, math and stats are inherently racist and discriminatory and therefore shouldnt be considered. I repeat: R-A-C-I-S-T!!!!!!11111oneoneeleven


Lol

Member
Posts: 50,932
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Sep 14 2018 06:39am
another point I noticed- their map of "marginal death rate per area" showed clusters of supposedly increased mortality around the airports and ports, but the negligible or 0-10% estimates in the most remote areas of the island in the mountains. So even though their hypothesis is that lack of access to medical care / power / supplies increased mortality, they show San Juan itself as being in the maximum 28%+ increased mortality range. San Juan. The place where humanitarian aid was piling up, overflowing with relief workers, with power back on and hospitals staffed. A place where the biggest issue was finding drivers and clearing roads so they could get the help out of San Juan and to the rest of the island.

The same San Juan that held disproportionately young and health populations of people who would be inclined to move to Florida in the aftermath of the Hurricane.

Well that really sends the noggin joggin now doesn't it?



This post was edited by Goomshill on Sep 14 2018 06:40am
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Sep 14 2018 06:41am
Quote (Goomshill @ Sep 14 2018 08:39am)
another point I noticed- their map of "marginal death rate per area" showed clusters of supposedly increased mortality around the airports and ports, but the negligible or 0-10% estimates in the most remote areas of the island in the mountains. So even though their hypothesis is that lack of access to medical care / power / supplies increased mortality, they show San Juan itself as being in the maximum 28%+ increased mortality range. San Juan. The place where humanitarian aid was piling up, overflowing with relief workers, with power back on and hospitals staffed. A place where the biggest issue was finding drivers and clearing roads so they could get the help out of San Juan and to the rest of the island.

Well that really sends the noggin joggin now doesn't it?

https://i.imgur.com/ey27Kwv.png


The media really is the enemy of the American people

Unaccountable media monopolies have become a threat to free Democracy
Member
Posts: 38,137
Joined: May 28 2006
Gold: 0.00
Sep 14 2018 08:13am
"Brainwashed! Hitler!" LMAO

Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1243824392440244124423169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll