d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
Prev1240241242243244424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 36,722
Joined: Feb 19 2021
Gold: 31,677.46
Nov 15 2021 08:58am
Do we get a verdict today, or is today 5 hours of closing arguments?
I didn't watch much on Friday
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Nov 15 2021 08:59am
Quote (lolkggz @ 15 Nov 2021 06:58)
Do we get a verdict today, or is today 5 hours of closing arguments?
I didn't watch much on Friday


5 hours of closing arguments plus motions, plus plus plus. Deliberation probably won't start until tomorrow.

I'm prepared to be wrong btw, this is just a guess.
Member
Posts: 36,722
Joined: Feb 19 2021
Gold: 31,677.46
Nov 15 2021 08:59am
Quote (InsaneBobb @ Nov 15 2021 08:59am)
5 hours of closing arguments plus motions, plus plus plus. Deliberation probably won't start until tomorrow.

I'm prepared to be wrong btw, this is just a guess.


Got ya, thanks
Member
Posts: 36,722
Joined: Feb 19 2021
Gold: 31,677.46
Nov 15 2021 09:08am
Judge receiving death threats?
Is the jury fully intimidated yet?

https://americanfaith.com/rittenhouse-judge-receives-hate-mail/
Member
Posts: 21,486
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 438.40
Nov 15 2021 09:16am
Quote (lolkggz @ 15 Nov 2021 07:08)
Judge receiving death threats?
Is the jury fully intimidated yet?

https://americanfaith.com/rittenhouse-judge-receives-hate-mail/


To my understanding, judges receive threats on all high profile cases, expect it, and are affirmatively prepared for it.

I do not believe threats against the judge are classed under jury intimidation.
Member
Posts: 50,930
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Nov 15 2021 09:43am
So in that moment we have proof, undeniable and crystal clear, that the prosecutors brought charges they knew were false. They argued right up until the judge dismissed it that Rittenhouse was possessing an illegal firearm based on its barrel length, and asked the judge to leave it up to the jury to measure the rifle. He simply asked them to bring the rifle up to him and he would measure it right then and there, and they dropped it and told the judge the state no longer maintains the barrel was too short. They knew the barrel wasn't short, they brought the charges anyway. How is that not malicious prosecution right then and there?
Member
Posts: 36,722
Joined: Feb 19 2021
Gold: 31,677.46
Nov 15 2021 09:44am
Quote (Goomshill @ Nov 15 2021 09:43am)
So in that moment we have proof, undeniable and crystal clear, that the prosecutors brought charges they knew were false. They argued right up until the judge dismissed it that Rittenhouse was possessing an illegal firearm based on its barrel length, and asked the judge to leave it up to the jury to measure the rifle. He simply asked them to bring the rifle up to him and he would measure it right then and there, and they dropped it and told the judge the state no longer maintains the barrel was too short. They knew the barrel wasn't short, they brought the charges anyway. How is that not malicious prosecution right then and there?


POSSESSION OF A FIREARM UNDER 18 - not guilty.
Member
Posts: 33,368
Joined: Dec 20 2007
Gold: 11,600.00
Nov 15 2021 10:11am
Quote (Goomshill @ 15 Nov 2021 07:43)
So in that moment we have proof, undeniable and crystal clear, that the prosecutors brought charges they knew were false. They argued right up until the judge dismissed it that Rittenhouse was possessing an illegal firearm based on its barrel length, and asked the judge to leave it up to the jury to measure the rifle. He simply asked them to bring the rifle up to him and he would measure it right then and there, and they dropped it and told the judge the state no longer maintains the barrel was too short. They knew the barrel wasn't short, they brought the charges anyway. How is that not malicious prosecution right then and there?


Yeah this is definitely a witch hunt. They knew the rifle was legal. Even then, screw the tax stamp/SBR law.

ATF should be abolished.
Member
Posts: 4,802
Joined: Feb 6 2020
Gold: 347.20
Nov 15 2021 10:13am
Quote (Goomshill @ Nov 15 2021 11:43am)
So in that moment we have proof, undeniable and crystal clear, that the prosecutors brought charges they knew were false. They argued right up until the judge dismissed it that Rittenhouse was possessing an illegal firearm based on its barrel length, and asked the judge to leave it up to the jury to measure the rifle. He simply asked them to bring the rifle up to him and he would measure it right then and there, and they dropped it and told the judge the state no longer maintains the barrel was too short. They knew the barrel wasn't short, they brought the charges anyway. How is that not malicious prosecution right then and there?


You shocked? World is filled with clueless people who will listen to anything told to them until proven wrong.

Read the shit some users post here (Thor and the people alike). These guys went full retard living within their spectrum.
Member
Posts: 93,011
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,214.94
Nov 15 2021 10:14am
Quote (Goomshill @ Nov 15 2021 10:43am)
So in that moment we have proof, undeniable and crystal clear, that the prosecutors brought charges they knew were false. They argued right up until the judge dismissed it that Rittenhouse was possessing an illegal firearm based on its barrel length, and asked the judge to leave it up to the jury to measure the rifle. He simply asked them to bring the rifle up to him and he would measure it right then and there, and they dropped it and told the judge the state no longer maintains the barrel was too short. They knew the barrel wasn't short, they brought the charges anyway. How is that not malicious prosecution right then and there?


well there's an argument over whether you measure the barrel length from the tip to the top of the mound or tip to the base of the balls.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1240241242243244424Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll