Quote (Ghot @ Sep 5 2018 10:35am)
Oh, we need it spelled out for the short bus?
'subpoenaed Hillary for the emails'.
Do we understand yet. Do we realize this is a forum and NOT a court of law? If that's all you got, I'll take it my point was made.
not everyone who is guilty can be charged and indicted for it. i agree that HRC is guilty of evidence tampering, or at least she has a goat ready to slaughter if those charges were to ever materialize with no paper trail linking her to the actual act. thus the charges weren't filed against her.
i'm not sure what part you're confused about, but since you just keep claiming there is some deep state conspiracy not to charge her by the DOJ i have to assume all of it. you're allowed to have forum opinions that stand outside of legalities, but when your opinions are on legalities, and they're incorrect at that, then the legalities themselves are directly relevant. u do that a lot, reference a specific legal term in one of your "its just my opinion maaaaaaan" rants and then back off when challenged. i can give u a list of words that you shouldnt ever use to avoid this, if it helps. not a glossary, god i cant even imagine the confusion, just a list of words.