The very first thing you said on this thread was repeating a fake narrative

“Crossed state lines with an illegal gun” or something along that line.

Turns out he retrieved a gun in Wisconsin that was legal for him to carry.

Literally your first post on this thread dude stop trying to play dumb


I’ll even concede that you said he may get off on self defense. That doesn’t change the fact.

This post was edited by WickedDarkJuggalos on Nov 15 2021 12:41am

Did anybody know that prior to the trial? I didn't see it posted anywhere until it came out during trial.

I can own up to me being wrong about that. It was the only information available at the time.

My position from the start (except the part in the middle where I was obviously trolling) was that Kyle was likely to get off on self defense, but it wasn't a sure thing, and would probalby get convicted on the gun charges.



Doesn't change the fact that we have Trump's campaign passing data to Russia. So, yeah. lol. Keep trying to deflect.

This post was edited by NetflixAdaptationWidow on Nov 15 2021 01:03am

I didn’t watch the whole trial but from what I’ve seen, the prosecution was really weak. The kid shot in self defense. Never shot first.

There shouldn’t have even been a trial. Why are we wasting money on this? He should have been charged with any gun laws he broke, bam him from ever owning firearms, and move on.

Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.

He funded trump 1 million.

So what? He states they need Hillary to win. That’s the bias and that’s the interference. A foreign country meddling and meeting with Hillary.

You gained a point of credibility good job buddy!

You are still deep in the negatives but you got me here!




The way it was explained in the court room is that the way the law was written there were two scenarios that both had to be met to technically be breaking the law. He was only in violation of one of the conditions so according to Wisconsin law he wasn’t violating any laws.

The judge said explicitly he does not believe he should be convicted of illegally holding a weapon. He also said he will explain the law the best he can and let the jury decide.

This charge ultimately comes down to a poorly written law that was put in place to protect children from breaking the law while they are hunting with their parents.

Dude ur a republican like wtf are you talking about ignorance LMFAOOOOOOOOO

Okay, Jere or ti or dark or shoop. (That’s your group: The Lacking)

This post was edited by Landmine on Nov 15 2021 08:21am

Stream's not quite live yet, but the stream with the panel of lawyers for closing arguments day: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7YXd2M5E-8

Edit: Stream is now live.

This post was edited by InsaneBobb on Nov 15 2021 08:50am