okay heres the original articles
I think this is the first mention of the sexual assault allegation (sept 12th, intercept):
https://theintercept.com/2018/09/12/brett-kavanaugh-confirmation-dianne-feinstein/and this is the first naming of her publicly:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/13/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-dianne-feinstein.htmlintercepts article says:
and nytimes article says:
How can Feinstein pretend that those leaks came from her Beach Friends instead of from Feinstein or Achoo's office?
The original articles aren't about the accusation itself, but Feinstein's possession of a document making the allegation and how it was being handled.
Which is something Blasey Ford couldn't even know. What, is Feinstein keeping her in the loop about palace intrigue with the letter after she received it? Why? How?
Those accounts are totally inconsistent with friends approaching the media. Thats 100% a leak, and obviously a politically timed one.
They should have nailed feinstein again. They missed a chance