Never getting my guns.
Not even with a buy-back.

They don't need to they primarily want you by the balls. Taking away the guns is just hazing at that point.

It sounds like you are advocating for sensible gun control.

criminals are less likely to threaten you w/ a gun if they know your packing as well. So banning guns just increases gun violence/death by removing a penalty which is potentially getting fired in self defense. The forefathers knew this thats why they made the right to bare arms at the top of the list & also in relation to preventing corruption which go "hand & hand".

The gang mentality also doesnt apply when different class structures interact w/ each other as in the ghetto holding up middle class americans. Gun violence could go down in the ghetto but they'd have to manually remove them all because they dont normally get their guns through legal means which is why banning guns just hurts american patriots and not the true criminals.

This post was edited by lodd222 on Jun 1 2022 10:06pm

Let us know when they come for them.

Hope this helps.

Cold dead hand.

Britain is so safe that police generally dont even need to carry guns. Now they need to.
This is what the article is about.
Its sad that it needs to be explained to you....

How would having a gun have helped you in this scenario? You show up to your child's school, there's active shooting occurring. When you try to enter to save your child, armed and armored police, carrying the full authority of the government prevent you from acting. Sure, you could probably shoot an officer. But will you get to your kid when the other 17 officers shoot back? Further, let's just say you snuck past the line of police, you even killed the shooter. Great! Are you aware that because you entered a public K-12 school with a firearm, you're now a federal felon, and will have your right to own firearms removed from you, and end up in a concrete and steel cage, while your child gets to be raised in a fatherless home?

Several of the parents were armed. They could do nothing, precisely because the police, like an armed gang screening the actions of a new initiate, actively and violently prevented interference.



What the hell? Did Britain suddenly repeal all their gun control legislation? How could criminals possibly have guns on an island nation when guns have been outlawed? And if criminals have no guns, how on earth can you justify the need for arming police?

You make no sense.

??
I am literally just telling you how it is, there is zero subjective stuff on my post or nothinf that is supposed to not make sense.
If you are not friendly terms with reality, or cannot comprehend simple sentences, i cant do much for you.

Britain has extreme gun control. I thought gun control resolves gun violence, and removes the need for an armed police, isn't that what we've been told?

I have not seen a single piece of gun control legislation in Britain repealed. Britain is an island nation, so they can control what enters and exits their nation very easily.

Who are these armed terrorists that require the need for police to be armed with firearms at all, let alone selective fire weapons?

I'm on perfect terms with reality. And the reality is that guns exist. There are tens of millions of people (if not more) who are fully capable of making their own firearms. Firearms are here to stay. You can't stop them, you can't prevent them. And all any "gun control" law does is remove the rights of the law abiding citizen to defend themselves from criminals. Do you honestly believe that when you pass a gun law, a criminal is going to say, "Oh my god! I need to turn in my gun now, I wouldn't want to get arrested!" ?? Let's be honest, if that kind of nonsensical bullshit the left has been floating for the last 70 years even made sense, why not just write laws outlawing murder? Oh... Right...

So as it turns out, as the MAJORITY have been saying... Since the 1950's no less, it isn't a gun problem, it's a people problem. If violent crime and/or terrorism are on the rise in Britain to the point where they have to arm their police, yet no anti-gun legislation has been repealed, and indeed, anti-knife and anti-pointy potato peeler legislation has been added, then by the logic of "it's all the fault of guns, and more laws will solve it!" shouldn't Britain be safer than it's ever been?