Quote (net @ Oct 13 2021 12:17pm)
There's no research yet to show either way due to the vaccinated currently being used as test subjects for that data. Anyone taking the jab is literally making an uninformed decision and risk while simultaneously volunteering to be a test subject on the long-term impact.
most of this type of narrative derives from false information about the potential for long term effects.
like if there's a new acid reflux medicine, research shows that risks of heart attacks are likely zero or close. so they dont do long term studies on heart risks or make the clinical trials drag out 5 years because the adverse effects, and yes there are for any medical trial, are minimal.
what i find interesting is that anti-vaccine proponents talk often about the immediate and vast number of short term side effects that are studied and known about covid vaccines. and were known before the vaccine itself was made publicly available from the shortened clinical trials before public release and before the FDA gave the drugs temporary approval, which was then upgraded later. but also talk about unknown long term side effects based on a heap of incorrect data such as RNA gene resequencing or infertility fears not based on clinical data. its as if someone online said "maybe it will shrink ovaries" and people just ran with it.
predicting long term medical side effects of drug usage is not an exact science, but there's still generally a range of outcomes that are predicted and tend to be proven right. this happened even with C19 vaccines, and yet i hear statements like yours that imply we can't possibly know for a mystery number of years with any certainty.