d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Russia Collusion, Obstruction Of Justice Exposed
Prev123242526Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 31 2017 03:27am
Quote (AiNedeSpelCzech @ Oct 30 2017 06:23pm)
Looking really hard for where this shows Clinton had anything to do with approving the deal or did anything wrong or let the U.S. lose control of any of its uranium or or or or

Here's something from that liberal rag, Forbes, that covers it pretty nicely.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2017/10/27/claims-of-clinton-russia-uranium-scandal-are-a-real-empty-barrel/amp/

They own uranium that is of low quality, no significant percentage of what's out there, and which isn't allowed to leave the U.S. as near as I can tell. As nothing as a burger can get.



How do you explain 140 million dollars donated to clinton foundation and russia’s absense from Iran deal then?

Still bribery which is a felony. Even if the leftist twist is true

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Oct 31 2017 03:28am
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Oct 31 2017 04:22am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 31 2017 04:27am)
How do you explain 140 million dollars donated to clinton foundation and russia’s absense from Iran deal then?

Still bribery which is a felony. Even if the leftist twist is true


You guys are always reaching for conspiracies and performing leaps in logic for your guy at all times.

Trump people are certainly lacking credibility.

This post was edited by Skinned on Oct 31 2017 04:22am
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 31 2017 04:41am
Quote (Skinned @ Oct 31 2017 05:22am)
You guys are always reaching for conspiracies and performing leaps in logic for your guy at all times.

Trump people are certainly lacking credibility.


You think it's a reach that days after UraniumOne bigwigs donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, Sec Clinton approving the deal doesn't create a strong appearance of impropriety? One she was legally obliged to avoid while serving as SecState?
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Oct 31 2017 08:29am
Pfff Hillary is finished, and it's only the beginning! 😎
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Oct 31 2017 10:16am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Oct 31 2017 02:27am)
How do you explain 140 million dollars donated to clinton foundation and russia’s absense from Iran deal then?

Still bribery which is a felony. Even if the leftist twist is true


If there's a connection, and there's actual, tangible evidence that could result in an indictment, Donald Trump could simply instruct Jeff Sessions to appoint a special prosecutor.

But they have NOTHING. That's why they are pissing into the wind.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Oct 31 2017 10:17am
Member
Posts: 61,687
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Oct 31 2017 10:27am
Quote (Santara @ Oct 31 2017 03:41am)
You think it's a reach that days after UraniumOne bigwigs donated millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, Sec Clinton approving the deal doesn't create a strong appearance of impropriety? One she was legally obliged to avoid while serving as SecState?


Which bigwigs from that Canadian company, exactly? Name names here.

Show me the deal that Secretary Clinton's signature is on. Screengrab her signature from it and then link the full text below.

Also, what deal exactly? The one that allowed a Canadian company to mine for uranium that isn't allowed to leave the U.S. and a little bit of yellowcake that they legally process and send back?

You know the actual bribery scandal involving this already resulted in a conviction in 2015 because the Obama admin pursued it?


Let's see what Trumpies would bring out in a court room. Let's see the tangible evidence that can be used to indict. Compile it. The RNC will be so happy. You could be a hero! Let's see it.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Oct 31 2017 10:28am
Member
Posts: 52,226
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,902.00
Oct 31 2017 12:10pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ Oct 31 2017 11:27am)
Which bigwigs from that Canadian company, exactly? Name names here.

Show me the deal that Secretary Clinton's signature is on. Screengrab her signature from it and then link the full text below.

Also, what deal exactly? The one that allowed a Canadian company to mine for uranium that isn't allowed to leave the U.S. and a little bit of yellowcake that they legally process and send back?

You know the actual bribery scandal involving this already resulted in a conviction in 2015 because the Obama admin pursued it?


Let's see what Trumpies would bring out in a court room. Let's see the tangible evidence that can be used to indict. Compile it. The RNC will be so happy. You could be a hero! Let's see it.


This isn't new news.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

Quote
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.


What's new are the accusations by the whistleblower who just got released from his NDA with the FBI to talk to the Senate Intelligence committee. It's been strongly alluded to that as yet undisclosed information that the Obama administration had access to at the time was suppressed that would have scuttled the deal.

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/357230-fbi-informant-in-obama-era-russian-nuclear-bribery-cleared-to-testify-before
Member
Posts: 33,927
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Oct 31 2017 02:47pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ Oct 31 2017 12:16pm)
If there's a connection, and there's actual, tangible evidence that could result in an indictment, Donald Trump could simply instruct Jeff Sessions to appoint a special prosecutor.

But they have NOTHING. That's why they are pissing into the wind.



There were fbi testimonies. Plus written proof that Obama obstructed justice by issuing a gag order
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
Nov 2 2017 06:51pm


Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Nov 2 2017 07:20pm
http://start.att.net/news/read/article/new_york_daily_news-trump_blames_soninlaw_jared_kushner_for_muellers_w-tca

Quote
A seething President Donald Trump is placing blame for the current state of the widening Russia investigation on his son-in-law Jared Kushner, according to a report Wednesday.

As indictments were unsealed against former Trump campaign staff and special counsel Robert Mueller revealed Monday that at least one ex-Trump campaign adviser has pleaded guilty to federal charges, Trump's frustration with Kushner has grown exponentially, Vanity Fair reported.

The charges against former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, which Trump himself said happened "long before" he joined the eventual GOP nominee's team, should also worry the president, according to former Trump campaign aide Sam Nunberg.

"Here's what Manafort's indictment tells me: Mueller is going to go over every financial dealing of Jared Kushner and the Trump Organization," Nunberg said. "Trump is at 33 percent in Gallup. You can't go any lower. He's f ---ed."

Manafort and business associate Rick Gates face 12 felony counts, including money laundering, conspiracy and acting as unregistered foreign agents.

In a call Tuesday with former White House chief strategist Stephen Bannon, Trump laid the blame for the expanding scandal surrounding Mueller's probe into Russian election interference squarely on Kushner's shoulders, Nunberg told Vanity Fair.

"Jared is the worst political adviser in the White House in modern history," Nunberg said. "I'm only saying publicly what everyone says behind the scenes at Fox News, in conservative media, and the Senate and Congress."


Cannibalism continues.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev123242526Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll