d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Let's Talk About "fake News"
Prev1232425262736Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 25 2017 10:59am
Quote (Goomshill @ 24 May 2017 21:11)
So two things had to occur for the NYT to make their Manchester bombing story
1) Someone in the US intelligence community had to leak all those crime scene details after being given them by the UK
2) The NYT had to decide it was appropriate to publish these details on the national news
As far as journalistic integrity goes, well at least they aren't Nightcrawler yet.
You don't see anything wrong with the NYT routinely publishing leaked intelligence that is actively harming world security, without any objective but getting a bigger scoop?
Its not some grand crusade of transparency or whistleblowing. And the Intel services made specific requests they don't do this just a day earlier


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-40040210
from the BBC:

Code
Greater Manchester Police hope to resume normal intelligence relationships - a two-way flow of information - soon but is currently "furious", the BBC understands.
Its chief constable Ian Hopkins said the recent leak had caused "much distress for families that are already suffering terribly with their loss.".
The force - which is leading the investigation on the ground - gives its information to National Counter-Terrorism, which then shares it across government and - because of the Five Eyes intelligence sharing agreement - with the US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand.


All other US-UK intelligence is still being shared, while five terrorist plots have been disrupted in the UK since the 22 March Westminster attack, the BBC has learned.
Home Secretary Amber Rudd has said she is "confident" the leaks will now end, after having voiced her irritation following the leak of the attacker's name.
However, the pictures of debris - which appear to show bloodstained fragments from the bomb and the backpack used to conceal it - were subsequently leaked to the New York Times, prompting an angry response from within Whitehall and from UK police chiefs.


so it appears this info was shared across multiple governments and their ICs, and only ours managed to leak it to a tabloid. lovely stuff :wacko:
Member
Posts: 50,806
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
May 25 2017 01:51pm
Quote (inkanddagger @ May 25 2017 10:43am)
They know they can just blame Trump and their readers will eat it up, despite the fact that NYT is leaking and then blaming the administration for leaking.

It's fucking ridiculous and sick. I want real stories. I want something substantive that can actually bring down the Trump administration. But this tabloid style invention of the news is complete and utter bullshit. It's turning liberals away and giving conservatives more ammo.


They are conditioned to blame Trump
here are responses to me pointing out Trump was not the leaker to the lefties:

Quote
It was trump. You know it. I know it. We all know it was trump. Stop pretending that anyone honestly believes it wasnt trump.
And by the way, pointing out how trump leaked other intel that was given to us by our allies isnt whataboutism, its evidence that he also leaked this intel, because hes the kinda guy that just leaks info just because hes an idiot. Unlike trump, the actual intelligence community knows better than to do something that would hurt our relations with our closest allies.

Or whether it was someone else in the Intel food chain. Maybe someone with security clearance who shouldn't have it.
I too can speculate in the absence of evidence.

Are you actually Trump? This is perfect Trump projection. If you're accused of something, accuse someone else of it.

Yes, why don't we trust the man praising dictators and telling them our military deployments on a whim? He's certainly not repeatedly leaked remarkably sensitive data for no apparent reason.

The Trump admin leaked this too as part of their campaign to discredit the USIC. Pretty easy to see through this ruse, really.

How would the U.S. IC benefit from this leak? This stinks to the high heavens, and it is very convenient for a presidential administration that has been damaged by leaks. If you think this leak came from the same faction that is leaking info on Trump and Russia, then I have an island to sell you.


Once you've created the yellow journalism climate, its actually quite self sustaining. Once people believe what you want them to believe, human psychology kicks in. Tribalism kicks in. Petty defensive mechanisms kick in
You can post articles with headlines debunked by the content- CNN running its story on Sessions this week- you can post things which don't hold up to a cursory google check- WaPo's story about the Pope giving Trump his climate change pamphlet
When it becomes Us vs Them, the "Us" can do anything.


I think you're wrong on one count though: Is not turning liberals away. You overestimate humans.
Yellow journalism is effective.

This post was edited by Goomshill on May 25 2017 01:53pm
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 25 2017 04:57pm


explains a lot :rofl:

e: and plenty here and in the US trust these low-iq emotional breakdown having drunks and their reporting of #fakenews

This post was edited by excellence on May 25 2017 04:58pm
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
May 25 2017 05:05pm
Quote (excellence @ May 25 2017 04:57pm)
http://i.magaimg.net/img/kwz.png

explains a lot :rofl:

e: and plenty here and in the US trust these low-iq emotional breakdown having drunks and their reporting of #fakenews


Read 3 lines and I'll already tell you they're drawing conclusions the study may have siggested, but didnt prove. It's easy to tell when the media is spinning science into an emotional story and you fell for it


#fakenews
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 25 2017 05:13pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ 25 May 2017 19:05)
Read 3 lines and I'll already tell you they're drawing conclusions the study may have siggested, but didnt prove. It's easy to tell when the media is spinning science into an emotional story and you fell for it


#fakenews

your understanding of science is demonstrated by your zero med school interviews and your attempt to retroactively cite some "exit poll" when your lie is refuted

Suggested and didnt prove is exactly what the #fakenews crew and their supporters love, what with the 'russia' thing and the 'hillary in a landslide'

This post was edited by excellence on May 25 2017 05:14pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
May 25 2017 05:26pm
i see trump's war against the free press has been fully embraced by his biggest shills and gullible followers... brainwashed monkeys, haha...
Member
Posts: 53,368
Joined: Sep 2 2004
Gold: 57.00
May 25 2017 05:28pm
Quote (fender @ 25 May 2017 19:26)
i see trump's war against the free press has been fully embraced by his biggest shills and gullible followers... brainwashed monkeys, haha...

shocking racism, not expected from one who demands others call him a racist xenophobe

reported, btw
Member
Posts: 50,806
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,846.00
May 25 2017 05:32pm
Quote (fender @ May 25 2017 05:26pm)
i see trump's war against the free press has been fully embraced by his biggest shills and gullible followers... brainwashed monkeys, haha...


When Jon Stewart says "The media is manipulative and sensationalistic, stoking hate and fear to drive an agenda" its embraced and liberals tout their reason and levelheadness. Everyone else is brainwashed! We must be rational and objective
When Colbert says Trump is a treasonous russian cock holster who will murder poor people and start nuclear war and ban abortion, its based on stories like "Jeff Sessions didn't disclose meeting russians on forms that didn't require him to disclose such meetings"

This post was edited by Goomshill on May 25 2017 05:32pm
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
May 25 2017 06:08pm
Quote (fender @ 26 May 2017 01:26)
i see trump's war against the free press has been fully embraced by his biggest shills and gullible followers... brainwashed monkeys, haha...


how ironic that the guy whining about generalisation all the time is doing just that in pretty much every single post of his :santa:
Member
Posts: 12,201
Joined: Feb 13 2010
Gold: 14.88
May 25 2017 06:13pm
Quote (IceMage @ May 23 2017 10:41am)
Hannity taking his shit credibility even further down. It saddens me that so many millions take him seriously.


My brother's dead as shit. I don't think it would bother me at all if he was brought up in a national conspiracy and discussed on television. So long as his reputation isn't besmirched.

I have it from anonymous sources that the Rich family was told to stay quiet, or they'd have to plan a few more funerals.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1232425262736Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll