d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate > Santorum Wants To Ban Internet Porn > This Is Not A Joke
Prev1232425262731Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 31,209
Joined: Sep 26 2008
Gold: 0.00
Mar 17 2012 11:49pm
Quote (shay11 @ Mar 17 2012 09:41pm)
I suppose it is not worth mentioning freedom of speech. Where is the line between pornography and art?


There doesn't need to be one drawn?
Member
Posts: 20,885
Joined: Aug 23 2003
Gold: 13,405.43
Mar 18 2012 09:46am
Quote (sylvannos @ Mar 18 2012 12:49am)
There doesn't need to be one drawn?


There would need to be if internet porn was banned, no?
Member
Posts: 96,125
Joined: Mar 15 2007
Gold: 7,252.72
Mar 18 2012 10:03am
Quote (shay11 @ Mar 18 2012 01:41am)
I suppose it is not worth mentioning freedom of speech. Where is the line between pornography and art?


...that question was answered a long time ago !
Member
Posts: 20,885
Joined: Aug 23 2003
Gold: 13,405.43
Mar 18 2012 10:06am
Quote (WidowMaKer_MK @ Mar 18 2012 11:03am)
...that question was answered a long time ago !


Passive voice: the most informative way to communicate.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Mar 19 2012 02:02am
I am shaking my head at some of these responses...I don't even know how to respond to them actually. I'm sure that they will be singing a different tune once they actually have kids.
Member
Posts: 5,901
Joined: May 8 2010
Gold: 0.00
Mar 19 2012 02:05am
It's OK to see peoples' heads get blown off and shot to death, but my god if you show a woman's nipple it'll be the end of the line.

'Murica.
Member
Posts: 35,291
Joined: Aug 17 2004
Gold: 12,730.67
Mar 19 2012 02:15am
Quote (Ricelol @ Mar 19 2012 08:05am)
It's OK to see peoples' heads get blown off and shot to death, but my god if you show a woman's nipple it'll be the end of the line.

'Murica.


You know I was thinking about that the other day. It does seem bizarre that I would be more comfortable exposing kids to violence instead of sex/drugs. However, I think it's because violence is so unrealistic/unlikely to happen that it's ok to expose kids to it.
Member
Posts: 3,507
Joined: Mar 19 2012
Gold: 2,025.01
Mar 19 2012 04:29am
Quote (thundercock @ Mar 19 2012 01:15am)
You know I was thinking about that the other day.  It does seem bizarre that I would be more comfortable exposing kids to violence instead of sex/drugs.  However, I think it's because violence is so unrealistic/unlikely to happen that it's ok to expose kids to it.

I don't know about violence seeming unrealistic and unlikely to happen. I don't like seeing kids desensitized to gore, death, and general violence. I am not a fan of all the demeaning and disgusting pornography that is all over either, but more importantly I'm completely against regulating the internet. It should remain a free platform where anyone can share and obtain information and set up their soapbox or attempt to tear down someone else's. Parents need to take the lead role in deciding what is and isn't appropriate for their children see. I read several years ago that the media overtook "parents" as the #1 influence in children's lives. That's just sad. Parents can't always protect their kids from what they see, so they need to be more forthcoming about the reality of life, educate their children and encourage them to ask questions and make intelligent judgments. It would be nice if current and future generations could maintain some level of compassion and empathy as well. That seems to be dying off as people become more desensitized to everything.

As far as drawing a line between art and pornography--politics should have no part in that. That should be for the individual to decide.
Member
Posts: 57,901
Joined: Dec 3 2008
Gold: 286.00
Mar 19 2012 07:03am
Quote (thundercock @ Mar 19 2012 03:15am)
You know I was thinking about that the other day.  It does seem bizarre that I would be more comfortable exposing kids to violence instead of sex/drugs.  However, I think it's because violence is so unrealistic/unlikely to happen that it's ok to expose kids to it.


naive/10
Member
Posts: 55,374
Joined: Mar 6 2006
Gold: 220.48
Mar 19 2012 09:26pm
http://xfinity.comcast.net/articles/news-general/20120320/US.Rick.Santorum.Porn/

Quote
LOS ANGELES — The U.S. porn industry's movers and shakers accused Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum on Monday of pandering to conservative voters when he vowed to crack down on their business if elected.

In a statement posted on his website, Santorum said the United States is "suffering a pandemic of harm from pornography," which he said has been shown to produce brain changes in children and adults, cause the destruction of marriages, and contribute to prostitution and violence against women.

Santorum offered no evidence to back up those assertions. Steven Hirsch, who runs the Vivid Entertainment Group, dismissed them as "ridiculous and just plain wrong."

"It just feels like another ridiculous attempt by Rick Santorum to appeal to the far right," said Hirsch, chief executive and co-founder of Vivid, one of the industry leaders in the marketing of sex films, books and other ventures.

Rape, teen pregnancy and sex crimes have all dropped since porn became widely available through the Internet in the early 1990s, Hirsch said.

He and others said they believe Santorum targeted the porn industry because he sees it as an easy target.

"But what he doesn't understand," Hirsch said, "is that in the age of the Internet, people are more comfortable with adult material than ever before. He thinks that this will appeal to his core base of voters, and that may be true, but it certainly won't appeal to the mainstream population."

The porn industry generates about $8 billion a year when films, Internet downloads, sex toys, dance clubs and other ventures are included, according to the industry trade publication Adult Video News.

The city of Los Angeles, where industry officials say almost all of the country's porn films are made, recently enacted an ordinance requiring that actors use condoms, But that provision only applies to films made on location and not in a studio.

Hirsch and Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt acknowledged that if Santorum is elected he could appoint an attorney general who would step up porn prosecutions. But they added that winning convictions would be another thing.

The public has gotten so much more tolerant of porn, Flynt said, that he routinely sees things on television now that he couldn't publish in his magazine 30 years ago, when he was fighting his own obscenity battles in court.

"While they may not be interested in certain practices themselves, people don't want to impose their values on other people," Flynt said.

"The reason why you don't see a rash of obscenity prosecutions in the country today is because they can't get a conviction," he said. "If they could convict these people they would be prosecuting them.


on my home page.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1232425262731Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll