4 years as vice president doesnt give you enough experience to answer the question "you didnt remove trump's tariffs, why is that?"

its funny when trump proposed the 10% tarrifs they said the inflation it would cause for consumers would be crippling, then it turned out it wasnt crippling, and they were so effective that biden the defacto anti-trump candidate left them in place. but now he says he might raise them and they say again it will be crippling.

as to your actual post tho the economy doesnt need a 200 part plan in terms of a debate stage. you say you'll lower taxes for all, you say you'll increase jobs, and that's about it. the economy is a far less complex machine for presidential policy than say immigration and deportation. they pressed him on deportation and he didnt provide any plan at all, that was a far better critique. of course they let kamala slide on why she reversed her plans on the border and didnt even bother to ask what she'd do with the millions of illegal aliens.

but hey the city planner said no Haitians are eating dogs, so that ones is DEBUNKED! there are many reports they like to eat the ducks in the city parts, but hey no kitties have been reported, except on the evening news.

Remember, Harris was the last person in the room on many of Biden's decisions.

She had the opportunity to suggest a better plan to him.

She never did.

An "opportunity economy". Hmmm. LOL

I thought Harris was a cat lady?

Quite flip flopping Trumpists!

how do you know that mr 94k/thin air.

wouldnt the reasonble assumption be biden...forgot, and that when you transcribe the debate you realize they are making fun of any1 who would value such statements like:

we improve the economy by "helping the economy"
or we improve the plan by "tax and jobs"

that's what you call making fun of every1 who is watching and believes the kabuki theatrics as though it were accomplishing anything for them as a likely middle class underling.