Quote (Handcuffs @ Mar 28 2023 12:24pm)
I just find the semantic of needing a specific physical element to qualify as "violence" is odd, because it undermines what still remains hurtful, impactful, and abusive. It gives me very child-like "But I'm not touching you!" vibes.
for thousands of years violent meant physical, implicitly. and there were many other words to describe non-physical things that were still hurtful, impactful, and abusive.
there is physical, psychological, verbal, and sexual categories of abuse. there's even non-problematic violence like self defense or a linebacker tackling the running back.
the core of this is simple, people couldnt get others to respect non-physical abuse labels, so verbal abuse got lumped in for effect. there is zero other linguistic reason to expand the definition of violence, and it's clear as day this is an attempt at expansion.
make people respect the effect of bullying, or verbal abuse. dont just call it "violence" because respect for violence is baked in already, because that just results in people respective the word violence less.