d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1237423752376237723783169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 24,561
Joined: Mar 2 2008
Gold: 6.41
Aug 28 2018 07:18pm
Quote (Horford @ Aug 28 2018 07:17pm)
I wouldn't be mad at all. Would be entertaining to see conservatives live in fear like a lot of minorities in the U.S. are now.


Minorities only live in self imposed fear, violence at their own hands in their own neighborhoods. The rest is hysteria.
Member
Posts: 105,154
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Aug 28 2018 07:19pm
Quote (Sakuraba @ Aug 28 2018 09:16pm)
The end result of a Stalin type character trying to take power in the US would just lead to a conservative paradise with you and your ilk hanging in trees.




:lol:
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 28 2018 07:23pm
Quote (Sakuraba @ Aug 28 2018 09:18pm)
Minorities only live in self imposed fear, violence at their own hands in their own neighborhoods. The rest is hysteria.


Do you live in the U.S.?
Member
Posts: 61,688
Joined: Mar 14 2006
Gold: 28.77
Aug 28 2018 07:24pm
Quote (Sakuraba @ Aug 28 2018 06:16pm)
The end result of a Stalin type character trying to take power in the US would just lead to a conservative paradise with you and your ilk hanging in trees.


That's what you conservatives want to do to real Americans right now. So fuck it.

It is time for Jade Helm to be real.

This post was edited by inkanddagger on Aug 28 2018 07:34pm
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Aug 28 2018 07:28pm
a real Kumbaya moment Lord of the Flies style going on in here
Member
Posts: 54,209
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Aug 28 2018 08:44pm
Quote (fender @ 29 Aug 2018 02:35)
so you thought about trump's 'easy to win' tradewar and came to the conclusion it's justified?


Quote (Black XistenZ @ 29 Aug 2018 01:29)
Trump is fighting a trade war in order to end or change abusive trade practices by other countries which are hurting the american people. This is not an easy fight, and there will be unavoidable collateral damage.
It's only fair if the government is helping out those who had to take the collateral damage as long as the end result is there, which is better trade deals and business relationships.




Quote
does that mean you also don't understand what a trade deficit means and think the EU and canada for example were unreasonably taking advantage of america, so imposing wide ranging tariffs against them was a policy decision worth supporting?


I cant speak about Canada, but yes, before the trade wars broke out, the EU was imposing higher tariffs on american imports than what the americans charged on european imports. our european markets are more heavily protected and more heavily subsidized than the american ones. the ECB is artificially lowering the interest rates in the euro zone, which is almost like "doping" for the german and the dutch export economies in particular.

overall, I consider the distortion created by those points to be rather minor, so I dont really like the skirmishes going on between Trump and the EU, but I can understand the reasoning behind it. Trump's accusations against europe and germany in particular are not made up out of thin air!



What I consider really problematic, however, are the trade practices of the Chinese: huge subsidies and state-debt-funded growth, gigantic export surpluses that have had an adverse effect on the job markets in the rest of the world, theft and disrespect of the intellectual property of western companies, artificially low interest rates put up by the state-dependent instead of independent central bank, heavy entry barriers for western firms onto the chinese market while happily taking advantage of our open markets, and so on.

Trump is absolutely justified in being outraged at those abusive Chinese trade practices and in trying to force the Chinese to adopt more fair trade policies. Whether his approach for achieving this goal is the best one, and whether it will be successful at all, is a different question and remains to be seen.

When it comes to Mexico: Trump is currently making progress in renegotiations of NAFTA - I'd prefer to wait for the end result before assessing his success/failure on this frontline. That NAFTA killed millions of american jobs, as predicted by the critics at the time, is a fact though. So here, again, Trump is at least somewhat justfied in taking measures and adopting a new, more aggressive approach than his predecessors.

-------

Quote
that's really sad to be honest...

Fender in a nutshell:
"I'll lay out an undercomplex, short-sighted (mis)interpretation of what I perceive your arguments to be, and then I'll write one or two paragraphs about how ignorant, sad, stupid, racist, evil you are for ""thinking"" like that" - do you really consider this obnoxious style of debate of yours to be constructive?

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Aug 28 2018 08:45pm
Member
Posts: 30,165
Joined: Sep 10 2004
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Aug 28 2018 11:41pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 29 Aug 2018 03:44)
I cant speak about Canada, but yes, before the trade wars broke out, the EU was imposing higher tariffs on american imports than what the americans charged on european imports. our european markets are more heavily protected and more heavily subsidized than the american ones. the ECB is artificially lowering the interest rates in the euro zone, which is almost like "doping" for the german and the dutch export economies in particular.

overall, I consider the distortion created by those points to be rather minor, so I dont really like the skirmishes going on between Trump and the EU, but I can understand the reasoning behind it. Trump's accusations against europe and germany in particular are not made up out of thin air!


that's a bit of a pivot though. what you're actually doing it FINDING a reason to get behind what trump does. if you were honest, you'd know what HIS reasoning is: "we have a trade deficit with them, that means they are taking advantage of us" - he literally argued like that countless times.
also, you admitted it yourself (while trying to save face by pointing out that in a trade relationship of that scope there will ALWAYS be legitimate criticism to be made about ANY partner - you just left out the criticism of one side): overall it was an incredibly FAIR trade relationship with very low average tariffs and the majority of goods traded without ANY tariffs. it was also open to bilateral renegotiations that used to be conducted in good faith between both sides - all of that is already severely damaged. the only reason this might not escalate to a degree that damages both economies significantly is that you have rational and sane actors on our side, who are putting the interest of their economies above their personal pettiness (they also have to fear political consequences if the don't because unlike trump, they don't have supporters like you, who would get behind every idiotic decision they make because there is a cult around their person)...

Quote (Black XistenZ @ 29 Aug 2018 03:44)
What I consider really problematic, however, are the trade practices of the Chinese: huge subsidies and state-debt-funded growth, gigantic export surpluses that have had an adverse effect on the job markets in the rest of the world, theft and disrespect of the intellectual property of western companies, artificially low interest rates put up by the state-dependent instead of independent central bank, heavy entry barriers for western firms onto the chinese market while happily taking advantage of our open markets, and so on.

Trump is absolutely justified in being outraged at those abusive Chinese trade practices and in trying to force the Chinese to adopt more fair trade policies. Whether his approach for achieving this goal is the best one, and whether it will be successful at all, is a different question and remains to be seen.


can't really disagree with that, except the part where you're reluctant to evaluat if escalating into an outright trade war with china might be a smart way to go about it or not.

Quote (Black XistenZ @ 29 Aug 2018 03:44)
Fender in a nutshell:
"I'll lay out an undercomplex, short-sighted (mis)interpretation of what I perceive your arguments to be, and then I'll write one or two paragraphs about how ignorant, sad, stupid, racist, evil you are for ""thinking"" like that" - do you really consider this obnoxious style of debate of yours to be constructive?


your posts in a nutshell: "listen, i'm not saying trump is perfect, but here is a logically incoherent and intellectually dishonest way to justify almost every single one of his policies / statements / decisions" - do you really think people don't catch on to that? in essence, you're supporting about the same amount of insanity that the likes of bi-ghot and endlesscry are willing to stand for, you're just being more verbose about it and try to give it a pretty little spin if possible, almost like goo-shill.

This post was edited by fender on Aug 28 2018 11:47pm
Member
Posts: 53,359
Joined: Jan 20 2009
Gold: 4,383.11
Aug 29 2018 04:07am
Quote (Sakuraba @ 29 Aug 2018 03:16)
The end result of a Stalin type character trying to take power in the US would just lead to a conservative paradise with you and your ilk hanging in trees.


:lol:
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Aug 29 2018 04:34am
Quote (Horford @ Aug 28 2018 09:23pm)
Do you live in the U.S.?


Lib tears cup full again dang
Member
Posts: 70,459
Joined: Feb 3 2006
Gold: 28,299.69
Aug 29 2018 06:11am


this race will be a fun one

Trump lover vs a lefty

true clash of ideologies in a terrible terrible state
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1237423752376237723783169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll