All i got out of that is that he is a psychopath who abuses dogs and is detached from reality.

Your story about you inappropriately touching the genitals of animals is a sad deflection from the fact that you were wrong about what the study said.

a lot to dissect there

it could be baseless which just makes you a really really really weird dude

or it could be based in experience which would be terrible enough by itself but to add "too" as if there is an acceptable poodle ball kicking amount really adds frosting to the serial killer cake

that's cute, but you guys are reading too much into that. i'd never intentionally hurt a dog (or any animal that doesn't try to hurt me for that matter), it's just something that apparently doesn't translate well at all into english.

the point is that someone is really butthurt about abuse they suffered in the past so they resort to following you around, angrily yapping but never biting because they know who is stronger. sorry for the confusion and i appreciate your concern for the poor dogs, i really do.

Responding to your post (in political discussion subforum that i've been posting in for several years) and calling you out on your intellectual bankruptcy = following you around and thinking you are stronger?


TDS exhibit #18,100

This post was edited by cambovenzi on Aug 26 2018 05:34pm

again, your hurt feelings log doesn't replace facts.

lazy cultist excuse exhibit #34,270

This post was edited by fender on Aug 26 2018 05:35pm

???
I brought up the facts and you responded like an immature child.

Liberals are lazy as shit

They're used to all of their brainwashed professors agreeing with them so they don't know what a real statistical argument actually looks like

no, your namecalling and feelings towards me don't count as 'facts', sry...

Recognizing that you lied about what a study contained is not a feeling.

Lolbertarian back in here defending his owners.