There were some things about those accusations that left a little to be desired.
Atm I can't recall exactly what they were, but there were some things stated by the plaintiffs, that turned out, not to be true.

lol

Well, if I truly cared I could go back to the topic(s) concerning this incident. I was one of the posters in that topic. I pointed out the same thing then.

get your best piece of reality here

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/08/the-president-is-a-crook/568123/

very very nice

yes. Its not a “good” choice but it was the best choice. The other option was to disavow Moore which would have the effect that elites (Trump, RNC) interfered with an election.

In the situation that did play out, Roy Moore was rejected by the populus in a free and fair election.



Most of the allegations are almost certainly true and roy moore is a piece of garbage through and through. The yearbook was fake though

"They are kids bro"

Ghot when it's muslims

that's refreshing to hear

Even the 1st paragraph is untrue. It's also just an opinion piece.

iirc the added date in the yearbook was fake, but the signature wasn't. she neglected to state clearly that she added the date, and not moore. but i could be wrong and the whole thing could be fake, thats just not how i remember it. people tried to discredit the whole yearbook, iirc, because she omitted the date being added by her. but iirc she didnt say "roy wrote that date", so a lie by omission, i guess, and a lie that doesnt change the story. garbage human like you say.

I was gonna say, I thought the signature was verified by a handwriting expert?