d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1230123022303230423053169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Aug 17 2018 04:13pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 17 Aug 2018 22:48)
thats the point though: the american electoral system is giving the the rural ares and the 'space' an advantage over the urban centers of population, and this is by design. if it wasnt for the electoral college, the smaller, more rural states would never have joined the union. it is the increasing split in worldview and political preference between rural and urban areas, and the increasing alignment of the two major parties along this divide, that is causing the increase in electoral college - popular vote (or house majority - popular vote) splits in recent years.


This system is strictly in favor of republicans and is increasing with decades, rural areas always have been at right, in any country [or more likely].
So it cant be considered as a bilateral argument (for demo & rep) IMO

Quote (Ghot @ 17 Aug 2018 22:50)
Ah yes, the inevitable quarterly lefty/libtard crai-along.


Im very curious about the places where you are acquiring this vocabulary

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Aug 17 2018 04:14pm
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Aug 17 2018 04:18pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Aug 17 2018 05:13pm)
This system is strictly in favor of republicans and is increasing with decades, rural areas always have been at right, in any country.
So it's cant be considered as a bilateral argument (for demo & rep) IMO



Im very curious about the places where you are acquiring this vocabulary


Not really. The Democratic Party in the state of Minnesota is, and has been called the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party. Farmers have long supported democratic measures here, and elsewhere.
Member
Posts: 105,151
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Aug 17 2018 04:19pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Aug 17 2018 06:04pm)
I would keep the Electoral College, but implement the Wyoming Rule (where the population of the least populous state is used as the baseline for elector distribution) to make electors represent an equal portion of the population across states, rather than it being equated to each state's representation in Congress (plus DC).

Using this rule with the current populations of the US as a whole, and Wyoming in particular, the number of electors would go up to about 562 (an increase of 24).




Have you noticed, that the only time this attack on the reasoning behind the Electoral college, happens is when the results go against the popular vote?

/e I wonder why that is.


/ee How would the Wyoming Rule play out, with these 4-5 states and their ignoring of Federal Immigration laws.

I'm not saying that there aren't some improvements that could be made in the distribution of electoral votes, BUT, until we get a few other things worked out first....messing with the Electoral College as it is currently, will be disastrous.

Im think the worst thing we could do at this time would be to INCREASE the amount of electoral votes...for ANY reason. Cause you KNOW where those extra electoral votes will go.

This post was edited by Ghot on Aug 17 2018 04:31pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Aug 17 2018 04:31pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ 17 Aug 2018 23:18)
Not really. The Democratic Party in the state of Minnesota is, and has been called the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party. Farmers have long supported democratic measures here, and elsewhere.


It's global and it's real, your "exception" is confirming the main rule.

/e

https://www.maps4office.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/USA-Minnesota-Population-Map-County-Heatmap.png
http://ryanmattke.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/MNPresElection.jpg


Read the link i posted or just check this:



This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Aug 17 2018 04:38pm
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Aug 17 2018 04:34pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Aug 17 2018 04:18pm)
Not really. The Democratic Party in the state of Minnesota is, and has been called the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Party. Farmers have long supported democratic measures here, and elsewhere.



Saskatchewan, the most rural province in Canada, has also traditionally voted ndp provincially.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Aug 17 2018 05:50pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Aug 17 2018 05:31pm)


No. You said this (and made your edit after I had already replied):

Quote
rural areas always have been at right, in any country
.

You didn't say generally, or usually. You said ALWAYS. Which is, simply put, WRONG.
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Aug 17 2018 05:50pm
Quote (Black XistenZ @ 17 Aug 2018 16:59)
it is not a disaster for democracy. as in all first-past-the-post voting systems, it rewards an efficient geographic representation of support. this system is working just fine in the UK, Australia, Canada and some other countries. the real issue with the electoral college in the US is that the blocks that go to the winner of a simple majority are too big. the split between popular vote and electoral college only goes out of hand if a candidate can win a large number of electors by edging out a single narrow win.

-----------

another point to consider is that we dont really know how a presidential race for the popular vote would play out.. say both trump and clinton had campaigned in california and new york, do you think that clinton could have squeezed an even higher margin of victory out of these states, or would trump have cut his losses? same for texas: which side had more untapped voter potential in texas - conservatives or liberals? there are more conservatives in texas, they have a structural majority, but the turnout of democrats in texas is notoriously depressed. I really dont know how such a race would go, and neither does anyone else.

what we do know is that certain smaller states, like iowa and new hampshire, would get less candidate visits in a race for the popular vote. the distribution of candidate attention would without a doubt skew more heavily towards urban areas. by contast, under the current system, we have a healthy mix: candidates campaign in miami, philadelphia, denver and detroit, but also in iowa, new hampshire, ohio and north carolina. with the exception of the west coast and the deep south, the typical playing field encompasses every other type of region and electorate found in the country.


I agree with you. I don't think it's a disaster for democracy. I'm just having fun with Trump's blatant hypocrisy, but it almost goes without saying at this point. However, that's neither here nor there.

It is true that the Electoral College was created in part to incentivize candidates to appeal to a broad array of voters and states and not just urban centers. It's also true that we don't fully know how a popular vote race might have played out. In recent years, George W. Bush or Trump could have received more popular votes in 2000 and 2016 respectively, or Gore and Clinton could have smashed their Republican opponents by larger popular vote margins. Who knows.

However, there were reasons beyond the broad state appeal factor that the founders created the Electoral College for. Some of those reasons are outlined in Federalist Paper No. 68. They also wanted a group of people to act on a check and balance on the people, so to speak. A group of people that could potentially vet the candidates in ways most citizens might not have access to.

They also wanted an extra check to prevent blatant populists from becoming president, and people with potential influences from foreign powers. That's also why they didn't want any of the electors to be federally elected officials. They wanted an entirely separate group of people that would be less likely to have their hands in any sort of foreign power/money cookie jar.

The founders debated whether or not they wanted Congress to pick the President or not. They compromised with the EC. And if the EC couldn't agree on the President, it would go back to Congress. It's nearly impossible to know what they would think of the popular vote loser becoming president in 50% of the past elections, but I do agree that they would be happy to see that candidates are still required to appeal to a broad variety of states and regions and not just massive urban centers.

Quote (EndlessSky @ 17 Aug 2018 14:56)
Trump doesn't care about philosophy, he does/says things to get a particular material result


Quote (IgoSoHard @ 17 Aug 2018 14:59)
Of course he'd say that. People often make excuses when things don't go their way. Unfortunately Trump sometimes falls into this category.


Do you think Trump is a principled leader?
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Aug 17 2018 06:00pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ 18 Aug 2018 00:50)
No. You said this (and made your edit after I had already replied):
You didn't say generally, or usually. You said ALWAYS. Which is, simply put, WRONG.


NO, i made the edit BEFORE your post, and this model applies 80% of times. Because yes theres exceptions, it can be still big, but isolated, cities, it can be historical, and it can be specifically linked with an agricultural labor... It's still a good 80%.
It applies in France, in Europe, in whatever country, and theres many reasons: i dont really need to list the, you got the new york times or others relatively serious sources.

Not a big deal (actually it "always" applies for super mega cities, so i needed to correct it) and the future in not going in the opposite direction.

This post was edited by Saucisson6000 on Aug 17 2018 06:02pm
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
Aug 17 2018 06:20pm
Quote (Saucisson6000 @ Aug 17 2018 07:00pm)
NO, i made the edit BEFORE your post, and this model applies 80% of times. Because yes theres exceptions, it can be still big, but isolated, cities, it can be historical, and it can be specifically linked with an agricultural labor... It's still a good 80%.
It applies in France, in Europe, in whatever country, and theres many reasons: i dont really need to list the, you got the new york times or others relatively serious sources.

Not a big deal (actually it "always" applies for super mega cities, so i needed to correct it) and the future in not going in the opposite direction.


I quoted your original post, and made no changes to what I quoted (other than bolding a segment of it for emphasis), so timing or not, it's not what you initially said. And "super mega cities" ≠ rural areas (which is also what you originally said).

This post was edited by Surfpunk on Aug 17 2018 06:22pm
Member
Posts: 66,666
Joined: May 17 2005
Gold: 17,384.69
Aug 17 2018 06:30pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ 18 Aug 2018 01:20)
I quoted your original post, and made no changes to what I quoted (other than bolding a segment of it for emphasis), so timing or not, it's not what you initially said. And "super mega cities" ≠ rural areas (which is also what you originally said).


You posted 4 minutes after my edit.
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1230123022303230423053169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll