I did no such thing. I didn't say that you or all libertarians believe that.

He made a factually inaccurate statement about libertarians and the NAP and I corrected the record by mentioning proportionality is recognized.

Trying to write this off as 'lul you cant recognize hyperbole' is nonsense.
His statement and alleged humor was based on an inaccurate premise.

Many are not familiar with important details of libertarianism, yourself included, so I clarified it.

They get shot all the time, avoiding arrest after getting caught with weed is a big one. The president just doesn't cry on TV when it happens. Liberals don't really care either, just look at the current boer genocide in south africa.

He never said all libertarians believe it and specifically said he wasnt saying you believe it. He said "a lot" which is pretty noncommittal.

Don't be so sensitive dude

This post was edited by Thor123422 on May 11 2020 03:43pm

I didn't claim he said all libertarians believe it.

That doesn't mean it wasn't a false claim that misrepresented libertarians and the NAP.

Very simple concepts you might be able to handle one day.

So, what? You think there are no Libertarians who think what he described?

basically the trump defence, yes. i bet goon-shill would also claim he doesn't have a racist bone in his body...

I don't think Goomshill is racist. Rather, I think he really enjoys being contrarian to the common opinion by digging into the minutia of things.

there's a difference between 'digging into the minutia of things to be contrarian', and 'making stuff up while consistently siding with those that discriminate against / murder / disenfranchise minorities'. just because he's slightly more subtle about it than bi-ghot doesn't mean that his values are different.

it's really strange to me that people keep falling for that, how superficial civility seems to outweigh content for them.
i think it was snippy who said something similar about goon, claiming he was just being sarcastic / contrarian, even tough goon-shill repeatedly argued a certain point, that was also entirely consistent with his other posts in pard, and even explicitly dismissed the notion that he was just joking / not serious.

so i'm really curious what you base your 'he's not a racist' statement on. is it maybe "because he doesn't say the n-word to a black person's face"? if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck all the time...