none of this is considered nuance. That is fact and it has been projected even amongst voters. We all know that Trump isn't a politician and he won't know the ins and outs of the system. He is and probably still is a business man, and even if what you said is basically true to the core, it isn't nuance. It is fact.



this is the definition of nuance.

Stating the obvious and pretending like some rant of a worker in a business is full of nuance is a joke.

Snipa blows Chris up in 3...2...1...

The guy is barely beyond 10th grade, blow me up.... LOL

You can't either. You are just some old fart that once in a while shows me the wisdom of his age but you are pleb beyond that too.

At least you're doing one thing correctly...punching up instead of down.

I kinda think its funny that you'd consider one of the dumbest people on this sf to own me in a matter of nuance. I think its laughable that they think its nuance too. Nuance is a thing you use in a discussion of expanding beyond the authors perspective and application in a retrospective or interpretive manner. Stating the situation something is done in is not nuance.

I find it telling that you think Snipa is one of the dumbest people in this sub. Or that you believe that, in a world where Trump's base pretty much considers him a demigod, looking at him as a "head coach hoping that the QB remembers the playbook" isn't a nuanced position in that context.

That'd be an analogy.

Analogies can't present a nuanced view?

You should know they can, English major.