The globe spins and its moving around the sun in space what is the problem? Not sure what you mean about the stars rotating. As you can clearly see them at the night's sky.
What do you mean by X axis wouldn't even exist if we were on a globe? Feels like you are throwing terms you don't understand to appear smarter than you really are.
The reason you can see the moon and the sun at the same time on some days is because the moon spins around earth at a different rate to how the earth spins around the sun. Some days you will see it during the day and some days depending the the cycle you will not see the moon at night because it will be completing its rotation on the other side of the globe.
Antarctica can experience 24h sun but only in certain months of the year in certain regions because the way the earth spins relative to the sun.
There are plenty of videos and models demonstrating how it does this. Its not difficult to grasp either. We have people in space taking live footage of earth being a globe and you are performing mental gymnastics over here trying to deny it.
Where is the proof of your so called god that you think is real? So far you have brought copious amount of tinfoil and no proof to back it up.
As far as spin goes which way is it spinning do you think?
Good luck answering that. Seriously try and answer this though if you can. You won't be able to.
The stars rotate both clockwise and anti-clockwise in opposing hemispheres. The globe would need to rotate both ways too in order for this to fit. But the heliocentric model has it rotating a specific way.
And again that's why there are no stars in your fake moon footage or any of the globe models. They can't possibly fit with that model.
It appears you have the same observations as me though.
I mean you are logic enough to know a 24 hr sun is in one hemisphere. That means 24hrs darkness in the opposing hemisphere. The sun can only light up half of a sphere not the other half. So if the suns in the arctic for 24hrs in that hemisphere that would mean the other hemisphere is in complete darkness for 24hrs. Try it with a light and a ball if you can't grasp the words.
That alone doesn't fit with the globe model. That's not what happens.
And seeing the sun and moon in the sky at the same time you see that observation too. This would mean in the other hemisphere there is an absence of photons. Ie: there is no sun and moon on the opposite half of the planet. But that's not what happens in real life. There isn't just an absence of photons like that.
And an X axis means a horizontal plain. That doesn't exist on a globe whatsoever. This goes against all geometry which is real science.
Try fitting geometry, astrology and physics into the globe model and it fails. Miserably. As far as physics goes if you believe in gravity as a downwards force to the center of the sphere that would require things to compress to a point of singularity or infinitely. That is pseudo-science you can't fit the concept of gravity into a globe model either.
The globe model has it's uses sure, but it's definitely not your reality. And I haven't even talked about the curvature nonsense. Remember your observations. Many objects remain visible over distances where the curvature formulas should conceal them. Like a lighthouse for example.