d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1227322742275227622773169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 13 2018 10:24am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Aug 13 2018 12:22pm)
Oh boy - another Wa Po reporter making a completely baseless claim from "anonymous sources". Lets all go riot and burn the american flag now


Oh boy - another trump cultist crying fake news at anything not from Fox News.
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 13 2018 10:27am
first McCabe now Stzrok... very concerning to me that anyone who has a personal (not professional) bias against Trump just gets fired now...

Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Aug 13 2018 10:29am
Quote (Horford @ Aug 13 2018 12:27pm)
first McCabe now Stzrok... very concerning to me that anyone who has a personal (not professional) bias against Trump just gets fired now...


Sooooo thirsty for something to latch on to.

This post was edited by EndlessSky on Aug 13 2018 10:31am
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Aug 13 2018 10:29am
Quote (ThatAlex @ Aug 13 2018 11:08am)
Good riddance.

Is the FBI filled with B and C team bureaucrats who failed to make it to Capitol Hill?

This guy oversaw two major FBI investigations. I am not impressed. One of the best things the 2016 election has done is help expose the FBI. It needed to be better for the American people.


If Strzok sent those texts on his private cell, most of us wouldn't even know his name. FBI agents have political opinions... I'm sure there were agents on Hillary's investigation who hated her and expressed it on their private phones. Unless it influences them to take improper actions related to the investigation, who the hell cares? Are we going to need to review the texts of every agent on a high profile politically related investigation?

This post was edited by IceMage on Aug 13 2018 10:30am
Member
Posts: 54,185
Joined: May 26 2005
Gold: 4,945.67
Aug 13 2018 10:32am
Quote (IceMage @ 13 Aug 2018 18:29)
If Strzok sent those texts on his private cell, most of us wouldn't even know his name. FBI agents have political opinions... I'm sure there were agents on Hillary's investigation who hated her and expressed it on their private phones. Unless it influences them to take improper actions related to the investigation, who the hell cares? Are we going to need to review the texts of every agent on a high profile politically related investigation?


there's a difference between an FBI agent texting "I hate Trump's platform" and an FBI agent who is currently involved in an investigation into Trump texting "dont worry, [he's not gonna win,] we're gonna stop him".

This post was edited by Black XistenZ on Aug 13 2018 10:32am
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Aug 13 2018 10:32am
Quote (Horford @ Aug 13 2018 12:24pm)
Oh boy - another trump cultist crying fake news at anything not from Fox News.


Strzok can still testify against Trump. Nothing was obstructed. Wa Po is just sputtering in circles again
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 13 2018 10:43am
Quote (EndlessSky @ Aug 13 2018 12:32pm)
Strzok can still testify against Trump. Nothing was obstructed. Wa Po is just sputtering in circles again


guilty conscience?
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 13 2018 10:46am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 13 2018 12:32pm)
there's a difference between an FBI agent texting "I hate Trump's platform" and an FBI agent who is currently involved in an investigation into Trump texting "dont worry, [he's not gonna win,] we're gonna stop him".


yes it looks bad, but he was trying to court Lisa Page, someone who probably dislikes Trump more than Strzok, of course he's going to say dumb shit that's going to be taken out of context. Do you really take that text literally? Why is it that we're supposed to take everything literally EXCEPT when it comes to the president, we're frequently told "oh, don't take him seriously" or "don't take it literally".
Member
Posts: 49,289
Joined: Jun 18 2006
Gold: 11.77
Aug 13 2018 10:47am
Quote (Black XistenZ @ Aug 13 2018 11:32am)
there's a difference between an FBI agent texting "I hate Trump's platform" and an FBI agent who is currently involved in an investigation into Trump texting "dont worry, [he's not gonna win,] we're gonna stop him".


I agree that particular text is troubling... and warranted questioning. Still, the others aren't bothersome at all to anyone who accepts that government officials who are tasked to run investigations or prosecute people might have strong personal opinions of those people.
Member
Posts: 5,942
Joined: Apr 29 2018
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
Aug 13 2018 10:47am
Quote (IceMage @ Aug 13 2018 12:29pm)
If Strzok sent those texts on his private cell, most of us wouldn't even know his name. FBI agents have political opinions... I'm sure there were agents on Hillary's investigation who hated her and expressed it on their private phones. Unless it influences them to take improper actions related to the investigation, who the hell cares? Are we going to need to review the texts of every agent on a high profile politically related investigation?

100% true
(bold) is very important
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1227322742275227622773169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll