Quote (Santara @ Nov 13 2021 02:24pm)
We've been over this ad nauseum. Compressing his body over time is what killed him. I was just pointing out that Chauvin was indeed on his neck.
Don't worry. Goomshill knows better than forensic experts, lawyers and whoever else who has spent more time learning a subject than he has and he won'tstop until we agree.
Quote (Goomshill @ Nov 13 2021 02:20pm)
That was a still image from a fraction of a second as he shifted his weight. They reviewed that exact moment at trial. And the autopsy was quite clear, there was no bruising to the neck, no trachea damage, no subdermal trauma, no petechial hemorrhaging, no physical indication of any kind of wound from the restraint at all. 91.5 lbs of pressure applied to a small cross section would creating bruising in seconds, let alone eight minutes.
How did Chauvin manage to leave no mark at all on Floyd? It doesnt take much force to creating trauma detectable by a thorough medical examine like that autopsy.
Theres no plausible explanation for Floyd being able to talk freely and move his head, and no detectable damage of any kind- than to figure that the force applied was minimal, not using his body weight. What else can explain it?
Floyd died because of police brutality. End of story. You really have to go a long way to disprove everything that was handled in court. Rittenhouse on the other hand seems to have acted pretty convincingly in self-defense. I disagree with the whole armed underaged citizen going to "protect property" but aside from that the kid seems to have been genuinely threatened. This is the first time ever I watched a trial after reading up on the Floyd case and it made me respect the judicial system in a different way. Obviously the abundance of video material in this era is a game-changer, but we're talking about now and honestly I believe you need to learn some humility. Get back to school.