d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Political & Religious Debate >
Poll > Trump 2016 > Trump Vs Clinton
Prev1225122522253225422553169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
  Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please register or login.
Member
Posts: 105,149
Joined: Apr 25 2006
Gold: 10,475.00
Aug 6 2018 10:37am


I just love how it seems to be OK for Hillary or the DNC to collude with Russia via the Steele Dossier, to get dirt on Trump, but if Trump talks with Russia to get dirt on Hillary... it's not OK.

Ah, yes I'd like my double standard with cheese please.
Member
Posts: 15,652
Joined: Jun 29 2010
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Aug 6 2018 10:52am
Quote (Horford @ Aug 6 2018 08:41am)
>not a Russian government agent
>got grants from the RUSSIAN GOVERMENT

so the Kremlin was paying Kogan for perfectly benign reasons?


Lol'd
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Aug 6 2018 12:04pm
Quote (Goomshill @ 6 Aug 2018 09:46)
"lets make 90% of what democrats talk about be relitigating the 2016 election"
"lets get triggered and virulently hostile any time the words "hillary" and/or "clinton" are used in a sentence"


The key difference is that Trump is President and Clinton is not.

Personally, I'm fine with investigating whatever wrongdoing Clinton and the DNC did or did not do during the 2016 election.

Our issue is when Clinton is repeteadly brought up to steer a discussion away from Trump. If you wanna talk about Clinton, fine, but don't use her political behavior to justify anything Trump did or didn't do or to avoid discussion about Trump.

And yes I believe Trump deserves more media (not necessarily legal) scrutiny than Clinton right now. He is the President. There are claims about Clinton colluding with Russia. Those claims could be true, but she also isn't the person who is holding summits with foreign leaders right now.

The endless whataboutism is what is derailing productive discussion.

My idea: We should make a Hillary Clinton Russian Collusion thread where all claims, stories, and info pertaining to her potential wrongdoing can go over there instead of here. It would also be looked down upon for posters to bring up Trump whataboutisms in that thread, too, unless there was some potentially important legal implication relating the two. This could limit whataboutisms in both threads and force users to look at each situation more independently and honestly.
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Aug 6 2018 12:07pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Aug 6 2018 10:04am)

And yes I believe Trump deserves more media (not necessarily legal) scrutiny than Clinton right now. He is the President.


"not necessarily legal"

What do you mean by this?
Member
Posts: 33,928
Joined: Oct 9 2008
Gold: 2,528.52
Aug 6 2018 12:10pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Aug 6 2018 02:04pm)
The key difference is that Trump is President and Clinton is not.

Personally, I'm fine with investigating whatever wrongdoing Clinton and the DNC did or did not do during the 2016 election.

Our issue is when Clinton is repeteadly brought up to steer a discussion away from Trump. If you wanna talk about Clinton, fine, but don't use her political behavior to justify anything Trump did or didn't do or to avoid discussion about Trump.

And yes I believe Trump deserves more media (not necessarily legal) scrutiny than Clinton right now. He is the President. There are claims about Clinton colluding with Russia. Those claims could be true, but she also isn't the person who is holding summits with foreign leaders right now.

The endless whataboutism is what is derailing productive discussion.

My idea: We should make a Hillary Clinton Russian Collusion thread where all claims, stories, and info pertaining to her potential wrongdoing can go over there instead of here. It would also be looked down upon for posters to bring up Trump whataboutisms in that thread, too, unless there was some potentially important legal implication relating the two. This could limit whataboutisms in both threads and force users to look at each situation more independently and honestly.


I understand media scrutiny but the media doesnt care about scrutiny.

The media just doesnt want trump to succeed. Its a big difference.
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Aug 6 2018 12:15pm
Quote (JohnMiller92 @ 6 Aug 2018 13:07)
"not necessarily legal"

What do you mean by this?


I mean that if Clinton participated in any potential wrongdoing, she should face an equal amount of legal scrutiny as Trump, even though she is a private citizen and he is President.

But media scrutiny? Yes, I believe Trump deserves more of that than Clinton. Our public officials typically deserve higher levels of scrutiny, especially if they are in powerful positions.
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Aug 6 2018 12:17pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Aug 6 2018 10:15am)
I mean that if Clinton participated in any potential wrongdoing, she should face an equal amount of legal scrutiny as Trump, even though she is a private citizen and he is President.

But media scrutiny? Yes, I believe Trump deserves more of that than Clinton. Our public officials typically deserve higher levels of scrutiny, especially if they are in powerful positions.


The left dominates MSM, so the chance of that happening is pretty low imo
Member
Posts: 50,910
Joined: Jan 20 2010
Gold: 5,335.99
Aug 6 2018 12:27pm
Quote (ThatAlex @ Aug 6 2018 12:04pm)
The key difference is that Trump is President and Clinton is not.

Personally, I'm fine with investigating whatever wrongdoing Clinton and the DNC did or did not do during the 2016 election.

Our issue is when Clinton is repeteadly brought up to steer a discussion away from Trump. If you wanna talk about Clinton, fine, but don't use her political behavior to justify anything Trump did or didn't do or to avoid discussion about Trump.

And yes I believe Trump deserves more media (not necessarily legal) scrutiny than Clinton right now. He is the President. There are claims about Clinton colluding with Russia. Those claims could be true, but she also isn't the person who is holding summits with foreign leaders right now.

The endless whataboutism is what is derailing productive discussion.

My idea: We should make a Hillary Clinton Russian Collusion thread where all claims, stories, and info pertaining to her potential wrongdoing can go over there instead of here. It would also be looked down upon for posters to bring up Trump whataboutisms in that thread, too, unless there was some potentially important legal implication relating the two. This could limit whataboutisms in both threads and force users to look at each situation more independently and honestly.


The problem here is that Hillary Clinton is proximate to almost all the discussions about the 2016 election and Russiaburger.
Her shadow is cast over all the ensuing slapfights because the simple fact is Hillary Clinton has far more to do with Russia in the 2016 election than Trump does.

You can't just brush it aside as a whataboutism when the very reason that Russia hacked the DNC emails and released them was a specific revenge on Hillary Clinton for her interference in the 2011 elections- something which had dick all to do with Trump and everything to do with Clinton. It was a personal beef between Hillary and Vladimir. Everything we've learned about since has reinforced this and nothing has contradicted it. And then on top of it, we found out the ways in which Hillary was embroiled in foreign interference in the 2016 election, Ukraine via the Manafort ledger-embassy story, Russia via the Steele Dossier, and I'd bet my left nut that China played a significant role but at least they had the good sense to keep it pretty quiet with Cui Tiankei meeting with Podesta in secret for unknown reasons.

Now I'd prefer a world where Hillary just gets lost in the woods and never returns to the public's attention, but the left is relitigating her election to delegitimize her loss, the media is obsessed with the Russian campaign directed against her, and Mueller is just this past week referring Tony Podesta for FARA violations- the man who made his whole living off selling access to the Clintons.

Hillary is just one woman. It was always just pure pandering when Trump talked about locking her up, because her fate was irrelevant and tearing down the temple would bring ruin on us all, not 'drain the swamp'. And he showed that when the very first thing he did upon winning the election was say he ain't gonna bother with her and betrayed all his supporters who kept screeching about her. That alone gave me some real confidence in him. But Hillary is like herpes and isn't going away
Member
Posts: 12,379
Joined: Jul 14 2008
Gold: 2,620.00
Aug 6 2018 12:34pm
Quote (EndlessSky @ 6 Aug 2018 13:10)
I understand media scrutiny but the media doesnt care about scrutiny.

The media just doesnt want trump to succeed. Its a big difference.


I think there is an element of truth to that. There are a lot of networks and publications that absolutely eat up any Trump gaffes or scandals and sensationalize even the most benign of occurences that take place in his administration.

On the flip side, Trump also has the most-watched cable news network in America shilling for him and defending him at every turn on a daily basis. That has to at least be a factor in why his approval rating floor remains so high and his support within the GOP is so robust.

The media also gives Trump an unprecedented amount of attention. This helped him win the GOP nomination and reach the Oval Office. So I'm not even sure if the media as a whole has been a net-negative for Trump. I'd argue it's been a net-positive for him overall.
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Aug 6 2018 12:57pm
Trump: If I say stupid shit i'll get coverage
Trump: *Says stupid shit*
CNN: TRUMP SAID A STUPID THING
Trump: WHY DO THEY HATE ME?!?!?!?!??!?!?!
Go Back To Political & Religious Debate Topic List
Prev1225122522253225422553169Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll