Trump is up 15 points in Indiana in the latest poll.

Looks like Cruz's attempt to steal the state and prevent Trump from getting 1,237 by hastily naming Fiorina as his VP didn't work.

Now Cruz is stuck with a subpar VP pick and blew his load early.

Hillary vs Trump is what this country wants.

He thinks Fiorina will help him in California

The move was mainly made for hin to see a potential jolt in Indiana.

Trump is up 27 points in California in the latest Fox poll, whereas Trump's lead in Indiana over Cruz was only in single digits a week ago.

Indiana is Cruz's last chance to win a state and stop the Trump train.

He's 92% unfavorable with Hispanics.

EDIT: I have to wonder if he'll be able to redeem himself by pointing out how NAFTA has screwed some folks in Mexico, the war on drugs, etc.

This post was edited by thundercock on May 1 2016 01:26pm

He is going to say a lot of things but I don't see it changing the damage done. I think the unfavorables with women and non white people and non crazy people are set in stone imo.

Yes, I agree. His unfavorables with women and Hispanics will probably remain terrible, and there isn't really anything he can do to significantly change that.

I do think Trump can open up a little more support from Blacks (especially in the rust belt and midwestern states), but it's not going to be a whole lot. Blacks don't have as much of a problem with Trump, they just like Hillary better.

tell that to the central park 5

me = "today's poll = 49 to 34". This is a fact, and part of a larger argument put forth.
you = "lol its an outlier". carving out small parts to suit your needs.

fine, negate this with the Cruz winning outlier poll and it's a still comfortable margin of victory.



you = nitpick arguments trying to sound smart. you have 10-15 years in terms of age and 50k+ posts on most people here, probably all in this subform, try and use better arguments next time
source = realclearpolitics
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/in/indiana_republican_presidential_primary-5786.html#polls

now shhh racist bigot

Right, but you had to quote the outlier as though it was going to be a decent predictor of what was going to happen, and you don't even know what you're talking about enough to have recognized what I meant by outlier.

In essence, what I'm trying to say is that you should probably understand anything at all about polling before you start talking about polls, that's all. You can try to attack who I am as a person because you're not smart enough to disagree with what I actually said, I guess, but it doesn't actually help.

Trump beats Hillary