Quote (Arsenic_Touch @ Aug 2 2018 01:54pm)
[URL=https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vice-news/]https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/vice-news/[/URL]
I knew all of that already. Lol. That website didn't cite any specific case of unfactual reporting.
Quote (JohnMiller92 @ Aug 2 2018 01:59pm)
Jordan Peterson interview
[URL=https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=434&v=DZrSrZpX5l8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=434&v=DZrSrZpX5l8[/URL]
Now repent and repay your scams.
Not watching your dumb videos but if you have a link i'll read it.
Quote (balrog66 @ Aug 2 2018 01:56pm)
Vice reporting is so silly. This summarizes it pretty well.
[VIDEO]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw5UzBjgCiI[/VIDEO]
Silly? Interesting choice of words... i find it informative and illuminating and entertaining.
Quote (thesnipa @ Aug 2 2018 01:56pm)
you answered yourself. the first media outlet to break stories is often going to make mistakes. in the modern era with real time reporting this means they edit their stories in real time as well. Look at any major news outlet the day of a school shooting, facts change by the minute. Vice is often first on the scene, and they are also tackling many unique subjects that other outlets don't, such as drug dealing, gangs, etc. when you have a lack of competition on any given subject matter it leads to a lack of cross examination. the left and right are both terribly biased, but the presence of both is a crucial part of fact checking.
am i going to spend part of my day looking up instances of a news site getting facts wrong? no. and you shouldnt need me to, all networks make factual errors, me digging up anecdotal evidence isn't going to prove or disprove anything. don't feel too bad if you're a big vice guy, they do phenomenal fringe/niche stories in the crime sector, and almost no network has much credibility as a source generally. why do you think shit for brains grandpa bitch widow only posts reuters articles? its one of the only decent publications out there factually.
I read Reuters articles as well as Vice articles. I mean you made it sound like they aren't an honest journalism/opinonism outlet in your first reply... I think they're pretty honest. I can't recall any specific instances of unfactual reporting and i've followed them for a while.