you answered yourself. the first media outlet to break stories is often going to make mistakes. in the modern era with real time reporting this means they edit their stories in real time as well. Look at any major news outlet the day of a school shooting, facts change by the minute. Vice is often first on the scene, and they are also tackling many unique subjects that other outlets don't, such as drug dealing, gangs, etc. when you have a lack of competition on any given subject matter it leads to a lack of cross examination. the left and right are both terribly biased, but the presence of both is a crucial part of fact checking.

am i going to spend part of my day looking up instances of a news site getting facts wrong? no. and you shouldnt need me to, all networks make factual errors, me digging up anecdotal evidence isn't going to prove or disprove anything. don't feel too bad if you're a big vice guy, they do phenomenal fringe/niche stories in the crime sector, and almost no network has much credibility as a source generally. why do you think shit for brains grandpa bitch widow only posts reuters articles? its one of the only decent publications out there factually.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Aug 2 2018 11:57am

Vice reporting is so silly. This summarizes it pretty well.

Jordan Peterson interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=434&v=DZrSrZpX5l8

Now repent and repay your scams.

This post was edited by JohnMiller92 on Aug 2 2018 12:00pm

are you really too stupid to distinguish between me explaining why someone chose a particular phrasing, and me actually supporting the flawed comparison you accuse me of making? why is it that everytime you get triggered by one of my posts, it's not the actual content of it but rather your own moronic misinterpretation?

maybe its because historically you're as clear as mud and as concise as War and Peace.

https://mobile.twitter.com/TheQuartering/status/1025058195545509888

weaponized 4chan autism is a wonderful thing. Got got id'd, confirmed by eyewitnesses and doxxed within hours and locked down all his own media / website. All based on his rather identifiable rainbow wife beater. Well, and his own tweets expressing violent hatred toward the guy. See how the legal drama unfolds now, but its worth pointing out that indeed the attacker in that case was a radical liberal SJW who wore 'punch nazis' shirts.

That guy probably thought he was fighting evil, but now he's going to jail. Ignorance like that is a crying shame

ofc. someone clearly over- and misinterpreting my post and attacking an imaginary position just HAS to be my fault. because of 'history'...

oh wait, based on history you constantly make such moronic statements simply because you 'dislike' me - and when i point out your flawed 'logic', you claim you were just 'trolling' - while typing up another pure ad hom rant. try to make it funny this time, ok?

we'll see. Justice has a lot of blind spots
The Charlottesville antifa guy that swung a heavy metal flashlight into an innocent old man's head after he got jumped unprovoked by his antifa buddy- got let off entirely by the judge who said 'first time offender, dont care if you nearly killed him, lol free to go'

Its a long road from here to the slammer